The Economist December 4th 2021 Britain 57search  presented.  The  reportreliesona
handful of articles and interviews,noneof
which establishes evidence ofharm.Much
is  made  of  an  online  perceptionsurvey
based on a sixminute fictionalvideoclip,
and a single question in a unrepresentative
survey  by  an  American  transgenderlobby
group.  The  growing  numberof“detransi
tioners”—people who identifyastrans,on
ly later to change their mind—isignored.
The third big complaint isthatthepro
posals would introduce the nebulouscon
cept of “gender identity” to Britishlawfor
the  first  time.  In  2020  a  grassrootscam
paign  by  feminists  succeededinforcing
the government to abandonplanstoallow
anyone  to  change  their  legalsexatwill.
That  would,  in  effect,  havemadeselfde
scribed gender identity the decidingfactor
in who counted legally as a manora wom
an,  abolishing  singlesex  spacesandser
vices  at  a  stroke.  The  plansare“asmoke
screen  for  bringing  genderidentityideol
ogy  into  law,”  says  Maya  Forstater,oneof
the  founders  of  Sex  Matters,anorganisa
tion campaigning for sexbasedrights.
The consultation comes asanindepen
dent review of genderidentityservicesfor
children is under way, led byHillaryCass,a
former  president  of  the  RoyalCollegeof
Paediatrics and Child Health.Findingsare
expected  next  year.  “Why  notwaituntil
after  Cass  is  published?”  asksDrBell.But
the government faces a dilemma.Itwants
to appeal to younger voters byshowingit is
not stodgy, while also signallingtosocially
conservative  older  and  workingclassvot
ers that it is not too “woke”. 
This  complicates  a  second uturnon
trans issues in quick succession.Andif the
bill  goes  before  Parliamentinitscurrent
form, mps may fear voting againstit,even
though  many  Conservativesandgrowing
numbers on the Labour benchesareunea
sy.  Few  voters  realise  howmuchiscon
cealed by the phrase “conversiontherapy”,
and mps may fear being smearedasbigots.
Perhaps most worrying istheimpacton
children.  Many,  it  seems,  areinterpreting
the stirrings of samesex attractionasindi
cating  a  trans  identity.  In  anarticlelast
year in BJPsych Bulletin, a medicaljournal,
Lucy  Griffin,  a  consultant  psychiatristin
Bristol,  and  coauthors  foundthat,ofthe
girls referred to gids in onecalendaryear,
only 8.5% were primarily attractedtoboys.
Collateral damage
Once such children reach 16,genderclinics
will  prescribe  synthetic  hormones.Such
drugs  were  used  to  “chemicallycastrate”
Alan Turing, Dr Griffin pointsout.Thegay
mathematician,  whose  codebreaking
helped defeat the Nazis, acceptedthedrugs
as an alternative to a prison sentence.“The
whole thing”, says Dr Griffin,“risksbecom
ing  an  exercise  in  damagingthepeople
they are setting out to protect.”n
SpycraftOpen book
F
orthebetterpartofa century,themain
preoccupationsoftheheadofBritain’s
SecretIntelligenceService,morecommon
ly knownasmi6,havebeenthemalfea
sanceofRussiansorterroristsor—asinthe
latest James Bond movie, “No Time to
Die”—some combination of both. But
times are changing. On November30th
RichardMoore,thespyagency’sboss,gave
hisfirstpublicspeechsincetakingcharge
inOctober2020.Russiaandterrorismfea
turedonhislistofthe“bigfour”priorities,
asdidthechallengefromIran’srevolution
aryregime,whichismovingsteadilycloser
tobeingabletodevelopa nuclearweapon.
But despite Russia’s alarming military
builduparoundUkraine(seeEuropesec
tion)anda recentterroristattackinLiver
pool,Chinawashisprimaryconcern.
“Adaptingtoa worldaffectedbytherise
ofChinaisthesinglegreatestpriorityfor
mi6,” declared Mr Moore. Such a pro
nouncement wouldhave been unthink
ableadecadeago,whenDavidCameron
andGeorgeOsborne,hischancellor,were
desperatetocourtChinesetradeandin
vestment, and eager to play down the
threatfromtheCommunistParty’shackers
andintelligenceofficers.
Thepoliticalwindsnowblowfroma
different direction. A review of foreign
policy in March concluded that China
poseda “systemicchallenge...tooursecuri
ty,prosperityandvalues”.InMayBritain
beganrippingoutChinesemadeHuaweikit from its 5gmobile networks. It recently
sent  an  aircraftcarrier  to  Asia,  part  of  an
eastward  surge  of  warships.  It  is  also  in
creasing coordination on intelligence and
military  issues  regarding  China  with  its
partners  in  the  Five  Eyes,  a  grouping  that
also  includes  America,  Australia,  Canada
and New Zealand. 
Mr  Moore,  who  joined  mi6  during  the
cold  war  and  spent  much  of  his  career  in
the  Middle  East,  said  that  his  service  was
also changing tack. “We are deepening our
understanding  of  China  across  the  uk in
telligence  community,  and  widening  the
options  available  to  the  government  in
managing  the  systemic  challenges  that  it
poses,”  he  said.  Chinese  spies  are,  he
warned,  “highly  capable”  and  conducting
“largescale espionage”. They are monitor
ing  and  coercing  the  Chinese  diaspora  in
Britain  and  using  social  media  to  “distort
public discourse”. 
But Mr Moore’s most urgent warning re
lated to science and technology. China, he
said,  was  “expanding  the  web  of  authori
tarian  control  around  the  planet”  by  ex
porting  surveillance  technology.  That  was
not  only  a  problem  for  recipients  made
vulnerable  to  Chinese  coercion,  but  also
for mi6 itself. “Our officers need to operate
invisibly to our adversaries,” he noted. Chi
nese  control  of  smartphones,  apps  and
telecommunications  networks,  as  well  as
access  to  vast  repositories  of  personal  in
formation—such as data from home genet
ictesting  kits  and  biometric  security  at
airports—have spun a “worldwide surveil
lance web” that makes it harder for mi6 of
ficers  to  operate  abroad  without  their
names and histories being uncovered. 
That  Mr  Moore  chose  to  air  such  con
cerns in a public forum is itself a novelty.
His  agency  was  not  officially  avowed,  nor
were  its  chiefs  named,  until  some  years
after  he  joined  it  in  1987.  Perhaps  because
of the years he spent aboveboard as a dip
lomat, he is unusually communicative. He
continues to operate his Twitter account, a
rarity among spymasters.
Such  openness  also  has  a  wider  pur
pose,  however.  As  threats  evolve,  intelli
gence  services  must  work  with  tech  com
panies  and  other  outside  talent  to  stay
ahead.  That  requires,  said  Mr  Moore,  a
“seachange...in  mi6’s  culture,  ethos  and
way of working”. The same urgency is visi
ble in increasingly vigorous attempts to re
cruit a wider range of people, something it
has struggled to do despite years of effort.
In  2021,  mi6  even  began  advertising  in
The Economistfor “individuals with diverse
skill sets and life experiences” to take part
time  and  consulting  roles.  More  surpris
ingly  still,  it  welcomed  applications  from
British and foreign nationals alike. The re
sult is a seemingparadox. “To stay secret,”
said Mr Moore, “wearegoing to have to be
come more open.”nChina looms ever larger for British
spies, says mi6’s chiefAspook who likes to speak