NOTES TO PAGES 309–12Allen W. Wood [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991], Addition to Paragraph 158, 199).
‘‘The family disintegrates, in a natural manner and essentially through the principle of personality,
into apluralityof families whose relation to one another is in general that of self-sufficient concrete
persons and consequently of an external kind’’ (ibid., §181, 219).
- Freud,Group Psychology, 15.
- Freud,Totem and Taboo, 161.
- See ‘‘President Sworn-in to Second Term,’’ Inaugural Address, George W. Bush http://
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/01. - Bob Woodward,Plan of Attack, end of chap. 3. See also State of the Union Address,
February 2, 2005: ‘‘In the long term, the peace we seek will only be achieved by eliminating the
conditions that feed radicalism and ideologies of murder. If whole regimes of the world remain in
despair and grow in hatred, they will be the recruiting grounds for terror, and that terror will stalk
America and other free nations for decades. The only force powerful enough to stop the rise of
tyranny and terror, and replace hatred with hope, is the force of human freedom. Our enemies
know this, and that is why the terrorist Zarqawi recently declared war on what he called the ‘evil
principle’ of democracy. And we’ve declared our own intention: America will stand with the allies
of freedom to support democratic movements in the Middle East and beyond, with the ultimate
goal of ending tyranny in our world’’ (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/02). - For the Bush quotation, see coverage of Bush’s interviews with the Al-Arabiya and Al-
Hurra television networks, May 5, 2004 (CNN.com 6 May 2004 http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALL
POLITICS/05/05/bush.abuse/). Regarding Blair’s statement, I heard this on BBC between May 3
and 5, 2004, but have not been able to find a corresponding print version. - Talal Asad makes a similar argument inGenealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of
Power in Christianity and Islam(Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993). See 268,
- Convergent studies that have linked liberalism’s constitutive outside with its internal oper-
ations (as opposed to treating its involvement with colonial or imperial discourses as ‘‘alien intru-
sions,’’ to use Barry Hindess’s phrase) include: Uday Mehta,Liberalism and Empire: A Study in
Nineteenth-Century Thought(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999); Dipesh Chakrabarty,
Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference(Princeton: Princeton Univer-
sity Press, 2000); Paul Gilroy,The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness(London:
Verso, 1993); and Barry Hindess and Christine Helliwell, ‘‘The ‘Empire of Uniformity’ and the
Government of Subject Peoples,’’Cultural Values6, no. 1 (2002): 137–50. - Raymond Williams,Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society, rev. ed. (Oxford: Ox-
ford University Press, 1983), 87. - Ibid., 88.
- A decisive change, Williams argues, comes with Herder in the late eighteenth century, who
insisted on the pluralization of culture across nations and periods, as well as among social and
economic groups within any given nation (ibid., 89). - Ibid., 90.
- Seyla Benhabib,The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era(Princeton:
Princeton University Press, 2002), 106. Benhabib elaborates: ‘‘These norms expand on the princi-
ples of universal respect and egalitarian reciprocity, which are crucial to a discourse ethic....
voluntary self-ascription and freedom of exit and association expand on the concept of persons as
self-interpreting and self-defining beings whose actions and deeds are constituted through culturally
informed narratives’’ (132). - Ibid., 124–25.
PAGE 731731.................16224$ NOTE 10-13-06 12:34:14 PS