The integral relation (8.51) follows from the divergence theorem. In the diver-
gence theorem, substitute F =H ×C , where C is an arbitrary constant vector. By
using the vector relations
∇·(H ×C) = C·(∇× H)−H ·(∇× C)
div F=∇·F=∇·(H ×C) = C·(∇× H) and
F·ˆen= (H ×C)·ˆen=H ·(C׈en) = C·(ˆen×H) (triple scalar product),
(8 .54)
the divergence theorem can be written as
∫∫∫
V
div (H ×C)dV =
∫∫∫
V
C·(∇× H)dV =∫∫
S
(H ×C)·ˆendS =
∫∫
S
C·(ˆen×H)dS (8 .55)
Since C is a constant vector one may write
C·
∫∫
V
∇× H dV =C·
∫∫
S
ˆen×H dS. (8 .56)
For arbitrary C this relation implies
∫∫∫
V
∇× H dV =
∫∫
S
ˆen×H dS. (8 .57)
In this integral replace H by F (H is arbitrary) to obtain the relation (8.51).
The integral (8.52) also is a special case of the divergence theorem. If in the
divergence theorem one makes the substitution F=φC , where φis a scalar function
of position and C is an arbitrary constant vector, there results
∫∫
V
div F dV =
∫∫∫
V
∇(φC)dV =
∫∫∫
V
C·∇ φ dV =
∫∫
S
C φ d S. (8 .58)
where the vector identity ∇(φC) = (∇φ)·C+φ(∇× C)has been employed. The relation
given by equation (8.58), for an arbitrary constant vector C, produces the integral
relation (8.52).
The integral (8.53) is a special case of Stokes theorem. If in Stokes theorem one
substitutes F =φC , where C is a constant vector, there results
∫∫
S
( curl F)·dS=
∫∫
S
∇× (φC)·ˆendS =
∫∫
S
(∇φ×C)·ˆendS
=
∫∫
S
(ˆen×∇ φ)·C dS =
∫
C
©C φ dr.
(8 .59)