When the cold-air-standard assumptions are utilized, it reduces to
(9–24)
A regenerator with a higher effectiveness obviously saves a greater
amount of fuel since it preheats the air to a higher temperature prior to com-
bustion. However, achieving a higher effectiveness requires the use of a
larger regenerator, which carries a higher price tag and causes a larger pres-
sure drop. Therefore, the use of a regenerator with a very high effectiveness
cannot be justified economically unless the savings from the fuel costs
exceed the additional expenses involved. The effectiveness of most regener-
ators used in practice is below 0.85.
Under the cold-air-standard assumptions, the thermal efficiency of an
ideal Brayton cycle with regeneration is
(9–25)
Therefore, the thermal efficiency of an ideal Brayton cycle with regenera-
tion depends on the ratio of the minimum to maximum temperatures as well
as the pressure ratio. The thermal efficiency is plotted in Fig. 9–40 for vari-
ous pressure ratios and minimum-to-maximum temperature ratios. This fig-
ure shows that regeneration is most effective at lower pressure ratios and
low minimum-to-maximum temperature ratios.
hth,regen 1 a
T 1
T 3
b1rp 21 k^1 2>k
P
T 5 T 2
T 4 T 2
516 | Thermodynamics
510152025
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
η th,Brayton
Pressure ratio, rp
With regeneration
Without regeneration
T 1 /T 3 = 0.2
T 1 /T 3 = 0.25
T 1 /T 3 = 0.33
FIGURE 9–40
Thermal efficiency of the ideal
Brayton cycle with and without
regeneration.
3
5
s
T, K
4 a
1
qregen = qsaved
1300
300
2 a
qin
FIGURE 9–41
T-sdiagram of the regenerative
Brayton cycle described in
Example 9–7.
EXAMPLE 9–7 Actual Gas-Turbine Cycle with Regeneration
Determine the thermal efficiency of the gas-turbine described in Example
9–6 if a regenerator having an effectiveness of 80 percent is installed.
Solution The gas-turbine discussed in Example 9–6 is equipped with a
regenerator. For a specified effectiveness, the thermal efficiency is to be
determined.
Analysis The T-sdiagram of the cycle is shown in Fig. 9–41. We first deter-
mine the enthalpy of the air at the exit of the regenerator, using the defini-
tion of effectiveness:
Thus,
This represents a savings of 220.0 kJ/kg from the heat input requirements.
The addition of a regenerator (assumed to be frictionless) does not affect the
net work output. Thus,
hth
wnet
qin
210.41 kJ>kg
570.60 kJ>kg
0.369 or 36.9%
qinh 3 h 5 1 1395.97825.37 2 kJ>kg570.60 kJ>kg
0.80
1 h 5 605.39 2 kJ>kg
1 880.36605.39 2 kJ>kg
Sh 5 825.37 kJ>kg
P
h 5 h 2 a
h 4 ah 2 a