Encyclopedia of Sociology

(Marcin) #1
DIVORCE

(SEE ALSO: Bureaucracy, Complex Organizations, Conver-
gence Theories, Family and Household Structure, Family
Roles, Industrial Sociology, Industrialization, Parental Roles,
Social Change, Social Structure, Technology and Society, and
Work and Occupations.)


REFERENCES


Baker, P.M. 1981 ‘‘The Division of Labor: Interdepend-
ence, Isolation, and Cohesion in Small Groups.’’
Small Group Behavior 12(1):93–106.


Bales, R.F,. and P.E. Slater 1955 ‘‘Role Differentiation in
Small Decision-Making Groups.’’ In T. Parsons et al.,
eds., Family, Socialization, and Interaction Process.
Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.


Bengston, V.L., and J.F. Robertson 1985 Grandparenthood.
Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.


Blau, P.M. 1977 Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York:
Free Press.


Blauner, R. 1964 Alienation and Freedom. Chicago: Uni-
versity of Chicago Press.


Blood, R., and D. Wolfe 1960 Husbands and Wives: The
Dynamics of Married Living. New York: Free Press.


Bott, E. 1957 Family and Social Network. London: Tavistock
Publications.


Burke, P.J. 1969 ‘‘Scapegoating: An Alternative to Role
Differentiation.’’ Sociometry 32(June):159–168.


Clemente, R. 1972 ‘‘The Measurement Problem in the
Analysis of an Ecological Concept: The Division of
Labor.’’ Pacific Sociological Review 15:30–40.


Durkheim, E. (1893) 1933 The Division of Labor in Society.
New York: Free Press.


Gibbs, J.P., and D.L. Poston 1975 ‘‘The Division of
Labor: Conceptualization and Related Issues.’’ Social
Forces 53 (March) 468–476.


Giddens, A. 1971 Capitalism and Modern Social Theory:
Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim, and Max
Weber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Hedley, R.A. 1992 Making a Living: Technology and
Change. New York: Harper Collins.


Kamo, Y. 1988 ‘‘Determinants of Household Labor:
Resources, Power, and Ideology.’’ Journal of Family
Issues 9:177–200.


Krause, E.A. 1982 The Division of Labor: A Political
Perspective. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.


Land, K.C. 1970 ‘‘Mathematical Formalization of
Durkheim’s Theory of Division of Labor.’’ E.F.
Borgatta, ed., Sociological Methodology 1970, 257–282.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.


Marx, K. (1867) 1977 Capital: A Critique of Political
Economy. New York: Vintage Books.
Moore, W.E. 1968 Economy and Society. New York: Ran-
dom House.
Putterman, L. 1990 Division of Labor and Welfare: An
Introduction to Economic Systems. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Rushing, W.A., and V. Davies 1970 ‘‘Note on the Mathe-
matical Formalization of a Measure.’’ Social Forces
48(March):394–396.
Simmel, G. (1890) 1976 ‘‘On Social Differentiation.’’ In
P. Lawrence, ed., Georg Simmel, Sociologist and Europe-
an. New York: Nelson.
Smith, Adam (1776) 1985 An Inquiry into the Nature and
Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: Modern
Library.
Smith, D., and R. Snow 1976 ‘‘The Division of Labor:
Conceptual and Methodological Issues.’’ Social Forces
55:520–528.
Spencer, H. 1884 Principles of Sociology. New York: Ap-
pleton-Century-Crofts.
Taylor, F. 1911 Scientific Management. New York: Harper.
Treiman, D. 1977 Occupational Prestige in Comparative
Perspective. New York: Academic Press.
Wallerstein, I. 1979 The Capitalist World-Economy. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Weber, M. (1908) 1947 The Theory of Social and Economic
Organization. New York: Free Press.
Whyte, W.F. 1943 Street Corner Society. Chicago: Chicago
University Press.

PAUL MORGAN BAKER

DIVORCE


Divorce is of sociological significance for several
reasons. To begin, divorce rates are often seen as
indicators of the health of the institution of mar-
riage. When divorce rates rise or fall, many soci-
ologists view these changes as indicating some-
thing about the overall quality of marriages or,
alternatively, the stability of social arrangements
more generally. Viewed from another perspective,
divorce interests sociologists as one of several
important transitions in the life course of individu-
als. The adults and children who experience di-
vorce have been studied to understand both the
causes and consequences. From this perspective, a
divorce is as much an event in the biography of
Free download pdf