Encyclopedia of Sociology

(Marcin) #1
DRUG ABUSE

and Children’s Adjustment.’’ American Psychologist 53
(No.2):167–184.

Hetherington, E.M., K.A. Camara, and D.L. Featherman
1983 ‘‘Achievement and Intellectual Functioning of
Children in One Parent Households.’’ In J. T. Spence,
ed., Achievement and Achievement Motives, 205–284
San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.


Hoffman, Saul D., and Greg J. Duncan 1988 ‘‘What
are the Economic Costs of Divorce?’’ Demography
25:641–645.


Huber, Joan, and Glenna Spitze 1988 ‘‘Trends in Family
Sociology.’’ In N. J. Smelser, ed., Handbook of Sociolo-
gy. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.


Krein, Sheila F., and Andrea H. Beller 1988 ‘‘Education-
al Attainment of Children from Single-Parent Fami-
lies: Differences by Exposure, Gender, and Race.’’
Demography 25:221–234.


Martin, Teresa C., and Larry L. Bumpass 1989 ‘‘Recent
Trends in Marital Disruption.’’ Demography 26 (1):37–51.


McLanahan, Sara S., and Larry Bumpass 1988 ‘‘Inter-
generational Consequences of Family Disruption.’’
American Journal of Sociology 94 (1):130–152.


National Center for Health Statistics 1998 FASTATS:
‘‘Divorce.’’ http://www.cdc.gov/nchswww/fastats/divorce.htm


Nock, Steven L. 1988 ‘‘The Family and Hierarchy.’’
Journal of Marriage and the Family 50 (Nov):957–966.


——— 1995 ‘‘A Comparison of Marriages and Cohabiting
Relationships.’’ Journal of Family Issues 16:53–76.


Peterson, Richard R. 1989 Women, Work, and Divorce.
Albany: State University of New York Press.


Phillips, Roderick 1988 Putting Asunder: A History of
Divorce in Western Society. New York: Cambridge
University Press.


Stetson, Dorothy M., and Gerald C. Wright, Jr. 1975
‘‘The Effects of Law on Divorce in American States.’’
Journal of Marriage and the Family (August):537–547.


U.S. Bureau of the Census 1975 Historical Statistics of the
United States: Colonial Times to 1970. Part I. Washing-
ton, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.


——— 1989 ‘‘Child Support and Alimony: 1985.’’ Cur-
rent Population Reports. P-23, No. 154.


——— 1989 ‘‘Studies in Marriage and the Family.’’
Current Population Reports. P-23, No. 162.


——— 1995 ‘‘Who Receives Child Support?’’ Statistical
Brief. http://www.census.gov/socdemo/www/chldsupp.html


——— 1998a ‘‘Money Income in the United States:
1997.’’ Current Population Reports. P-60, No. 200.


——— 1998b ‘‘Poverty in the United States: 1997.’’
Current Population Reports. P-60, No. 201.


——— 1998c ‘‘Household and Family Characteristics:
1997.’’ Current Population Reports. P-20, No. 515.
——— 1998d ‘‘Marital Status and Living Arrangements:
1997.’’ Current Population Reports. P-20, No. 506.
Weiss, Robert 1975 Marital Separation. New York: Ba-
sic Books.
——— 1976 ‘‘The Emotional Impact of Marital Separa-
tion.’’ Journal of Social Issues 32:135–145.
——— 1979 Going it Alone: The Family Life and Social
Situation of the Single Parent. New York: Basic Books.

STEVEN L. NOCK
ALISON BURKE

DRAMATURGY


See Symbolic Interaction Theory.

DRUG ABUSE


Drug abuse has been a major social problem in the
United States for almost a century and we are now
in the second decade of a continuing war on drugs.
Drug abuse is a health and criminal justice prob-
lem that also has implications for nearly every
facet of social life. It is a major element in the high
cost of health care, a central reason for the United
States’s extraordinarily high rate of incarceration,
and a focus of intensive education and treatment
efforts. Substance abuse is an equal-opportunity
problem that affects both high- and low-income
persons, although its consequences are most often
felt by those persons and communities that have
the lowest social capital.
Substance abuse, with its connotations of disap-
proval or wrong or harmful or dysfunctional usage
of mood-modifying substances, is a term that was
developed in the United States. The more neutral
term, dependence, is often used in other countries.
Addiction, which formerly communicated the de-
velopment of tolerance after use and a physical
withdrawal reaction after a drug became unavail-
able, has assumed less explicit meanings. Whatev-
er terminology is employed, there is intense socie-
tal concern about the use of psychoactive mood-
altering substances that involve loss of control.
This concern is manifest particularly for young
people in the age group most likely to use such
substances. Society is concerned that adolescents
Free download pdf