New Section 101 Case Law
On December 17, 2014, the Federal Circuit, in the case of University of Utah Research v. Ambry
Genetics, applied Section 101 against patent claims used by Myriad – that had previously not
been reviewed by the court.
Four composition of matter claims directed to DNA primers were held to be ineligible subject
matter, because they are directed to products of nature – citing the Supreme Court’s Myriad
decision. The court’s basis for concluding that the primers are directed to “products of nature”
was that they possess the same nucleotide sequence as the naturally occurring DNA.
In addition, two method claims were found to be ineligible subject matter because they were
directed to abstract ideas based on the use of the DNA primers – citing the Supreme Court’s
Mayo decision.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to this Intellectual Property Advisory,
please send a message to Chris Hummel at [email protected]http://www.bannerwitcoff.com© Copyright 2014 Banner & Witcoff, Ltd. All Rights Reserved. The opinions expressed in this publication are for the purpose of fostering
productive discussions of legal issues and do not constitute the rendering of legal counseling or other professional services. No attorney-client
relationship is created, nor is there any offer to provide legal services, by the publication and distribution of this edition of IP Alert.