property law

The Writte
Backgroun

Figur

In a nuts
nub and h

A heated
and flail
prosecuti
policy sh

(^6) In
from claim
en Description
nd and Recent D
re 4: Contr
shell, Mr. Si
hole (i.e., go
d Q&A perio
ing) that th
ion histories
hift (as well a
n response to a
ming a subset to
Requirement i
Developments
roversial Sli
incavage op
o from left to
od followed,
he presentati
s of thousand
as a lack of t
a question after
o claiming ever
in US Design P
ide from De
ined that if
o right above
, with design
ion defied y
ds of US des
transparency
r his presentatio
ry element, wo
Patent Prosecut
esign Day 20
the claim sc
e), then a WD
n patent pra
years of US
sign patents)
y and proper
on, Mr. Sincav
ould likely not t
tion:
0 13 Presenta
cope were a
DR rejection
actitioners re
SPTO practi
), and questi
r procedure i
vage opined th
trigger a WDR
ation
amended to
n should be m
esponding (a
ice (evidenc
ioning the n
in making th
hat amending fr
R rejection.
Page 4
disclaim the
made.^6
and some fu
ced in the p
eed for an a
he shift).
rom right to le
4 of 12
e bar,
uming
public
abrupt
ft, i.e.,