The Writte
Backgroun
FigOn the ap
Mr. Bow
a grid sy
track the
especially
Conclusi
The USP
to receiv
comment
and that
policy fo
as well.
It is antic
policy fo
practition
WDR sta
way by a
Held & M
system an
It is also
least in c
practice
in typica
(^16) E
(^17) A
to file DPA
en Description
nd and Recent D
ure 6: DPA
pplicant side
wens’ present
stem over D
e grid). Thi
y as no clear
ion and Nex
PTO agreed
ving written
ts that will
will also go
or DPAs. Ot
cipated that
or DPAs, p
ners hope th
andards in ef
a public com
Malloy, flex
nd should no
o respectfully
close situatio
specialist at
al situations,
xtracted from M
At the Roundtab
As with numero
Requirement i
Developments
A Filings are
e, obviously
tation showe
DPA figures t
is presentatio
r precedent e
xt Steps
to digest pu
comments (
likely reflec
o beyond “r
ther written
the USPTO
perhaps as a
hat WDR p
ffect, while r
mmenter at th
xibility for am
ot be cast asi
y submitted
ons in which
the USPTO
should be
Mr. Olszewski
ble, it was poin
ous embodime
in US Design P
e Increasing
y these DPA
ed an examp
to establish
on probably
exists to proh
ublic comme
(due March
ct the genera
rare situation
comments f
will then iss
a basis for
policy reflec
recognizing
he Roundtabl
mendments
ide because
that the de
h reasonable
O, and that m
returned—e
i’s presentation
nted out that th
nts and lengthy
Patent Prosecut
g^16
s are increas
ple of a mor
written desc
y caused som
hibit such a
nts from the
14). Both
al “anti-facto
ns” to proac
from public
sue another
MPEP ame
cts the stron
a need to pr
le via teleph
is “a virtue
of bad apple
terminer of
people can
more decisio
xpressly or
n at Design Day
his system will
y descriptive st
tion:
sing attorney
re complex f
cription supp
me unease a
strategy.
e Roundtable
AIPLA and
or” public c
ctively addre
presenters a
Federal Reg
endments.
ng public co
revent “gam
hone, Mr. Ch
not a probl
es seeking to
what is “fa
disagree—s
n-making au
otherwise—
y 2013 titled “
l disadvantage
tatements.
y and draftin
filing strateg
port for any
about prosec
e, and said i
d IPO plan t
consensus at
ess how to f
and commen
gister notice
In doing s
onsensus ag
ming the syste
hris Carani fr
lem” in the U
o “game the
airly” disclos
should not b
uthority abo
—to design p
“State of the Te
smaller entitie
Page 9
ng fees as w
gy (namely, u
amendment
cution effici
it looked for
to submit w
t the Roundt
fix current W
nters are exp
relating to W
so, design p
gainst height
em.” Put an
rom McAnd
US design p
system.”
sed in DPA
be a single d
out WDR, at
patent exami
echnology Cen
es that lack res
9 of 12
well.^17
using
s that
ency,
rward
written
table,
WDR
pected
WDR
patent
tened
nother
drews,
patent
As—at
design
least
iners.
nter.”
ources