Lecture 27: Mannerism and the Late Work of Michelangelo
Mannerism and the Late Work of Michelangelo .............................
Lecture 27
We are turning our attention back from northern Europe, where we
have been for several lectures, back to Italy. We are going to discuss
the movement, or style, called Mannerism, which is principally a style
associated with the 16th century.
W
e will learn the characteristics of Mannerism and study various
artists who used this style, including Jacopo Pontormo, Rosso
Fiorentino, Parmigianino, and Agnolo Bronzino. We will also
discuss the later work of Michelangelo. The style called Mannerism is
derived from the Italian phrase maniera della antica, meaning “manner of
the antique.” This term can be used to justify almost any aspect of style,
because just about every style can be found in the ancient art of Greece and
Rome and used as a model by living artists.
Mannerism arose in Italy for both psychological and stylistic reasons; that is, it
was not simply a development from the shadows in Leonardo’s paintings or the
later work of Raphael in the Vatican or the complexity of Michelangelo’s poses
for the human body. These were among the stylistic sources of Mannerism, but
the distortions of space, form, and color that characterize the style were given
a jolt forward by the Sack of Rome in 1527. Holy Roman Emperor Charles V
and King Francis I of France were enemies who chose Italy as their battle¿ eld.
The election of Pope Clement VII in 1523 had been controlled by Catholic
princes—Henry VIII of England, Francis I, and Charles V. The new pope, a
Medici, was a compromise candidate and a politically indecisive man in an
untenable position. He had antagonized the emperor; when Rome became
vulnerable, the emperor’s troops swarmed in, and violence erupted.
Though the emperor was Catholic, many of his mercenary soldiers were
German Lutherans who began the Sack of Rome and clamored for the
deposition of the pope, a move that did not have the emperor’s support. The
troops pillaged the holy city and terrorized its inhabitants. Artists À ed Rome,
and the city lost the artistic vitality that it had developed under the patronage
of Pope Julius II and Leo X.