Perreault−McCarthy: Basic
Marketing: A
Global−Managerial
Approach, 14/e
- Improving Decisions
with Marketing
Information
Text © The McGraw−Hill
Companies, 2002
Improving Decisions with Marketing Information 233
questionnaire can be completed anonymously. But the questions must be simple and
easy to follow since no interviewer is there to help. If the respondent is likely to be
a computer user, it may be possible to send the questionnaire on a disk (or put it on
a website) and include a help feature with additional directions for people who need
them.
A big problem with questionnaires is that many people don’t complete them.
The response rate—the percentage of people contacted who complete the ques-
tionnaire—is often low and respondents may not be representative. There is
particular concern about the representativeness of people who complete computer-
based or online questionnaires. The response rates tend to be even lower than by
mail. In addition, online respondents may be younger, better educated, or different
in other ways that impact how they answer. Mail, e-mail, and online surveys are
economical if a large number of people respond. But they may be quite expensive
if the response rate is low. The cost of the research may be wasted if the respon-
dents are not representative; worse, the results may be misleading.
Distributing questionnaires by e-mail, or at a website, is rapidly growing in pop-
ularity. The main reason is that it is almost instantaneous—and the responses come
back in computer form. Surveys sent by regular mail usually take a lot longer; pencil-
and-paper responses also need to be computerized. In business markets, the time to
deliver questionnaires can sometimes be reduced by faxing them.
Regardless of how quickly a questionnaire is distributed, people may take a long
time to respond. For example, with a mail survey, it often takes a month or more
to get the data back, which is too slow for some decisions. Moreover, it is difficult to
get respondents to expand on particular points. In markets where illiteracy is a prob-
lem, it may not be possible to get any response. In spite of these limitations, the
convenience and economy of self-administered surveys makes them popular for col-
lecting primary data.
Telephone surveys—fast and effective
Telephone interviews are popular. They are effective for getting quick answers to
simple questions. Telephone interviews allow the interviewer to probe and really learn
what the respondent is thinking. In addition, with computer-aided telephone inter-
viewing, answers are immediately recorded on a computer, resulting in fast data analysis.
On the other hand, some consumers find calls intrusive—and about a third refuse to
answer any questions. Moreover, the telephone is usually not a very good contact
method if the interviewer is trying to get confidential personal information—such as
details of family income. Respondents are not certain who is calling or how such per-
sonal information might be used.
Personal interview surveys—can be in-depth
A personal interview survey is usually much more expensive per interview than
e-mail, mail, or telephone surveys. But it’s easier to get and keep the respondent’s
attention when the interviewer is right there. The interviewer can also help explain
complicated directions and perhaps get better responses. For these reasons, personal
interviews are commonly used for research on business customers. To reduce the
Internet
Internet Exercise Perseus Development Corporation sells software that
allows a user to create online questionnaires that can be distributed by e-mail
or used on the Internet. To see samples of online questions, go to the
Perseus website (www.perseus.com) and then click on Sample Surveys. Do
you think that it’s more convenient for a consumer to complete a survey
online or with pencil and paper?