Perreault−McCarthy: Basic
Marketing: A
Global−Managerial
Approach, 14/e
- Promotion −
Introduction to Integrated
Marketing
Communications
Text © The McGraw−Hill
Companies, 2002
400 Chapter 14
Promotion is wasted if it doesn’t achieve its objectives. And that happens when
it doesn’t communicate effectively. There are many reasons why a promotion mes-
sage can be misunderstood or not heard at all. To understand this, it’s useful to think
about a whole communication process—which means a source trying to reach a
receiver with a message. Exhibit 14-5 shows the elements of the communication
process. Here we see that a source—the sender of a message—is trying to deliver
a message to a receiver—a potential customer. Research shows that customers eval-
uate not only the message but also the source of the message in terms of
trustworthiness and credibility. For example, American Dental Association (ADA)
studies show that Listerine mouthwash helps reduce plaque buildup on teeth. Lis-
terine mentions the ADA endorsement in its promotion to help make the
promotion message credible.
A major advantage of personal selling is that the source—the seller—can get
immediate feedback from the receiver. It’s easier to judge how the message is being
received and to change it if necessary. Mass sellers usually must depend on market-
ing research or total sales figures for feedback—and that can take too long. As we’ll
discuss later in this chapter, this has prompted many marketers to include toll-free
telephone numbers and website addresses as ways of building direct-response feed-
back from consumers into their mass-selling efforts.
The noise—shown in Exhibit 14-5—is any distraction that reduces the effec-
tiveness of the communication process. Conversations and snack-getting during TV
ads are noise. The clutter of competing ads on the Internet is noise. Advertisers
planning messages must recognize that many possible distractions—noise—can
interfere with communications.
The basic difficulty in the communication process occurs during encoding and
decoding. Encodingis the source deciding what it wants to say and translating
it into words or symbols that will have the same meaning to the receiver.
Decodingis the receiver translating the message. This process can be very tricky.
The meanings of various words and symbols may differ depending on the atti-
tudes and experiences of the two groups. People need a common frame of
reference to communicate effectively. See Exhibit 14-6. Maidenform encoun-
tered this problem with its promotion aimed at working women. The company
ran a series of ads depicting women stockbrokers and doctors wearing Maiden-
form lingerie. The men in the ads were fully dressed. Maidenform was trying to
show women in positions of authority, but some women felt the ad presented
them as sex objects. In this case, the promotion people who encoded the mes-
sage didn’t understand the attitudes of the target market and how they would
decode the message.^5
Source Encoding Message channel Decoding Receiver
Feedback
Noise
Exhibit 14-5
The Traditional
Communication Process
Encoding and decoding
depend on a common
frame of reference
Exhibit 14-6
This Same Message May Be
Interpreted Differently
Common
frame of
reference
Decoder
Encoder
Promotion Requires Effective Communication
Communication can
break down