Wine Chemistry and Biochemistry

(Steven Felgate) #1

542 C. Santos-Buelga and V. de Freitas


Vivar-Quintana et al. 2002). Using thiolysis, mean polymerization degrees


between 2.9 and 10.7 have been obtained for the compounds present in those humps


(Remy et al 2000; Salas et al. 2005), although not only pigments but also proantho-


cyanidins and colorless compounds present in the same extracts must account for


those results. According to our knowledge, the largest anthocyanin-tannin oligomers


detected in red wines correspond to colorless adducts consisting of one anthocyanin


moiety linked to a procyanidin trimer (Salas et al. 2005), although the possibility of


larger adducts, either colored or not, is hypothesized by the same group. Nonethe-


less, as far as we know, no actual polymericpigments have been characterized in red


wines, which does not mean that their presence should be discarded, as they may


instable and/or escape the usual techniques for separation and analysis. On the other


hand, the existence of various centres of asymmetry in the derived pigments that


contain tannin moieties makes possible the occurrence of many isomers whose dif-


ficult chromatographic separation could also be accounting for the humps observed


in the HPLC profiles of matured and aged red wines.


In assays carried out by our group, it was found that when ‘hump’ fractions


previously separated from red wines were further analyzed by RP-HPLC after


changing their pH to neutrality or by simple diluting them, they suffered a notably


decrease in their size at the same time that peaks of monomeric anthocyanins


(mostly malvidin 3-glucoside) not observed in the original hump fraction appeared


in the chromatograms (non-published results). This observation allows speculating


that, although the existence of large pigment structures cannot be ruled out, the


‘polymeric pigment material’ of red wines could be constituted, at least in part, by
anthocyanins retained physically rather than chemically into tannin clusters. This


had already been postulated by Somers (1966), who found that wine tannin material


separated by gel filtration on Sephadex gels contained pigment molecules that were


easily released by mild acid treatment, indicating that weak linkages were involved


in the retention of anthocyanins into the tannin matrix.


The pyranoanthocyanins in their diverse forms are the derived pigments more


usually found in red wines. They have been estimated to constitute about 70% of the


total derived pigments present in a two-year-old red wine (Alcalde-Eon et al. 2006)


and account for up to 50% of overall pigment material in a five-year-old wine


(Boido et al. 2006). Anthocyanin-ethyl-flavanol derivatives and, more recently, the


products of the direct condensation between anthocyanins and tannins are also


commonly detected in red wines, but their concentrations are lower than those of


pyranoanthocyanins and their relative contribution decrease in older wines (Alcalde-


Eon et al. 2006). When evaluated by the peaks observed in the HPLC chro-


matograms, the levels of all these pigments are apparently too low to explain the


color of the wines. The fact that they are totally or partially resistant to the dis-


coloring effect of the lowacidity and the presence SO 2 and, therefore, able to


express their color in wine conditions, contrary to the anthocyanins, might in part


explain this contradiction (Vivar-Quintana et al. 2002). In addition, the sum of the


contribution of the minor amounts of the diverse existing pigments and possible syn-


ergisms among them might also account for some of the color expression. Despite
this, it is assumed that a significant part of color expressed by aged red wines is still

Free download pdf