Magnetic Recording and Playback 1041
28.1 Introduction
Many things have changed since the first, second, and
third editions of this book were written. Magnetic
recording is may still be the dominant storage tech-
nology, but its dominance is slipping. The everyday use
of analog reel-to-reel recorders and longitudinal DASH
digital tape recorders is virtually gone as are helical
scan modular digital multitrack recorders. Computer-
based systems storing data on random access hard disk
drives are still popular, but as the price comes down on
memory-based recorders that have no moving parts at
all, these devices will certainly win out in the end.
The driving factor behind this shift is economy in
both the acquisition and operating costs of the newer
formats. The new systems utilize techniques and
components that were developed and are mass produced
for the consumer and computer markets, not just the
very limited professional audio market.
We will first explore the underlying technologies
common to all magnetic recorders, old and new. In spite
of the rapid growth of digital techniques in audio,
analog recording is by no means dead. Many albums are
still recorded and mastered using analog audio
recorders. In addition, the audio (and video) archives of
the second half of the twentieth century are stored in
vaults on millions of reels of analog tape. As a result,
we will need qualified tape recorder operators and
maintenance technicians for many years to come.
Unfortunately, however, much of the knowledge
about analog audio recorders and the mentors who
taught this information are slipping away. This chapter
will provide an overview and in some cases more detail
than the casual reader requires. A full treatment of the
theory and practice of analog recording and specifically
magnetic recording is clearly beyond the scope of this
work. We hope that this will whet the appetite of some
and spur others on to write more comprehensive
treatments.
The roots of the modern-day tape recorder can be
traced to Germany in the mid-1930s. Two German
companies, AEG and IG Faben, worked together to
develop the concept of recording on a coated tape. AEG
built the machine and IG Faben developed the magnetic
particles and manufacturing methods for the tape.
Although few people outside Germany took note, the
German tape recording industry flourished, with 5
million meters of tape being produced in 1939, Fig. 28-1.
The German machines, using a form of plastic tape, were
vastly superior to English recorders using steel tapes and
American recorders using spools of steel wire.
At the end of World War II, the victorious Allies set
aside all of Germany’s patents as a form of reparation
for the war. As a result, the wealth of German tape
recorder technology was quickly and freely exploited in
the United States and many other countries. Within just
a few years tape recording replaced disk cutting as the
primary method of recording information.
Magnetic tape offered several valuable advantages
over phonograph disk recording and even the American
fledgling wire recorders, including improved signal to
noise ratio, lower distortion, and better frequency
response. None of these quality features triggered the
quick adoption of tape recording by the American radio
networks.
The networks needed the ease of use, especially the
ability to create undetectable edits by cutting and
splicing the tape. The recorders also had an important
secondary benefit—the ability to stop and quickly
restart recording. (One does not stop a record cutting
lathe in the middle of a cut!)
Both of these features stem from the nature of the
tape recording. Tape recording is a serial process that
distributes the audio events on a very long piece of tape.
The time of the event is implicitly encoded in the posi-
tion of the event along the tape. The editing scissors and
tape now become a time machine that can alter the
apparent time of an event by relocating the tape
segment of the event to a new position in the reel.
Editing is merely playing tricks with this time machine
to remove or replace events to alter the program.
Ironically, more than 50 years later the pendulum has
swung back, turning the serial nature of tape into a
shortcoming. Most operations in a recording studio
require one or more replays of previously recorded
material. During a mixdown session, for example, the
same song may be replayed 500 times before the final
mix is finished. Each of these replays requires time to
rewind to the head end of the desired selection. A
3-minute tune recorded at 30 in/s occupies 450 ft of
Figure 28-1. German Magnetophon, 1935. This portable
magnetophone weighed over 100 pounds. Courtesy BASF
Corporate Archives.