and the dynamical equations as
d
dtΨ(x,t) ={Ψ(x,t),h}which can be evaluated to give
∂
∂tΨ(x,t) =−
i
2 m∂^2
∂x^2Ψ(x,t)Note that there are other possible forms of the Hamiltonian function that
give the same dynamics, related to the one we chose by integration by parts, in
particular
Ψ(x)d^2
dx^2Ψ(x) =d
dx(
Ψ(x)d
dxΨ(x))
−|
d
dxΨ(x)|^2or
Ψ(x)d^2
dx^2Ψ(x) =d
dx(
Ψ(x)d
dxΨ(x)−(
d
dxΨ(x))
Ψ(x))
+
(
d^2
dx^2Ψ(x))
Ψ(x)Neglecting integrals of derivatives (assuming boundary terms go to zero at in-
finity), one could have used
h=1
2 m∫+∞
−∞|
d
dx
Ψ(x)|^2 dx or h=−1
2 m∫+∞
−∞(
d^2
dx^2
Ψ(x))
Ψ(x)dx37.3 The propagator in non-relativistic quantum field theory
In quantum field theory the Heisenberg picture operators that provide ob-
servables will be products of the field operators, and the time-dependence of
these for the free-particle theory was determined in section 37.2. For the time-
independent state, the natural choice is the vacuum state| 0 〉, although other
possibilities such as coherent states may also be useful. States with a finite
number of particles will be given by applying field operators to the vacuum, so
such states just corresponds to a different product of field operators.
We will not enter here into details, but a standard topic in quantum field
theory textbooks is “Wick’s theorem”, which says that the calculation of expec-
tation values of products of field operators in the state| 0 〉can be reduced to
the problem of calculating the following special case:
Definition(Propagator for non-relativistic quantum field theory).The propa-
gator for a non-relativistic quantum field theory is the amplitude, fort 2 > t 1
U(x 2 ,t 2 ,x 1 ,t 1 ) =〈 0 |Ψ(̂x 2 ,t 2 )Ψ̂†(x 1 ,t 1 )| 0 〉The physical interpretation of these functions is that they describe the am-
plitude for a process in which a one-particle state localized atx 1 is created at