as follows
γ 0 M=
(
0 −iσ 2
−iσ 2 0
)
, γ 1 M=
(
σ 3 0
0 σ 3
)
γM 2 =
(
0 iσ 2
−iσ 2 0
)
, γM 3 =
(
−σ 1 0
0 −σ 1
)
Quadratic combinations of Clifford generators have a basis
γM 0 γ 1 M=
(
0 σ 1
σ 1 0
)
, γ 0 Mγ 2 M=
(
−1 0
0 1
)
, γM 0 γ 3 M=
(
0 σ 3
σ 3 0
)
γ 1 Mγ 2 M=
(
0 σ 1
−σ 1 0
)
, γM 2 γ 3 M=
(
0 −σ 3
σ 3 0
)
, γ 1 Mγ 3 M=
(
−iσ 2 0
0 −iσ 2
)
and one has
γ 5 M=iγ 0 MγM 1 γ 2 Mγ 3 M=
(
σ 2 0
0 −σ 2
)
The quantized Majorana field can be understood as an example of a quanti-
zation of a pseudo-classical fermionic oscillator system (as described in section
30.3.2), by the fermionic analog of the Bargmann-Fock quantization method
(as described in section 31.3). We take as dual pseudo-classical phase spaceV
the real-valued solutions of the Dirac equation in the Majorana representation.
Using values of the solutions att= 0, continuous basis elements ofVare given
by the four component distributional field Ψ(x), with components Ψa(x) for
a= 1, 2 , 3 ,4.
This spaceVcomes with an inner product
(ψ,φ) =
∫
R^3
ψT(x)φ(x)d^3 x (47.11)
In this form the invariance under translations and under spatial rotations is
manifest, with theS(Λ) acting by orthogonal transformations on the Majorana
spinors when Λ is a rotation. One way to see this is to note that theS(Λ) in
this case are exponentials of linear combinations of the antisymmetric matrices
γM 1 γ 2 M,γ 2 Mγ 3 M,γ 1 MγM 3 , and thus are orthogonal matrices.
As we have seen in chapter 30, the fermionic Poisson bracket of a pseudo-
classical system is determined by an inner product, with the one above giving
in this case
{Ψa(x),Ψb(x′)}+=δ^3 (x−x′)δab
The Hamiltonian that will give a pseudo-classical system evolving according to
the Dirac equation is
h=
1
2
∫
R^3
ΨT(x)γ 0 (γ·∇−m)Ψ(x)d^3 x
One can see this by noting that the operatorγ 0 (γ·∇−m) is minus its adjoint
with respect to the inner product 47.11, sinceγ 0 is an antisymmetric matrix,