23
physicalandspiritual,whichcannotbecomprehendedbymaterialunder-
standingalone.Andthevirtualdisappearanceofthatkindofpatronage
which dictatedtotheartista specificcontenthas thrownthepainter
moreandmoreuponhisinnerresources.Thequalitiesoftruthandreality,
oncesospecificintheirnature,mustbereinterpretedinthelightofpresent
conditions.Therelationshipbetweenanartwhichhasastrongabstract
basisandonewhichispredominantlyillustrativeinnatureisnotunlikethatwhichexistsbetweenbasicscienceandappliedscience.Ontheone
handthereisanintensepreoccupationwithaformalproblemforitsown
sake;ontheother,aspecificsolutiontoalimitedobjective.
Thisisnottheplaceforananalysisofnon-objectivepainting,butweshouldcallattentiontothefactthatitisamovementwhichembracesaDs
manyvariationsaswewillfindinso-calledrealisticart.Ittravelsallthe
wayfromthese\ere architectonicformalismofFritz Glarner'sTondoSo. 21 andthemeticulouspremeditatedorganization andexecutionof
GuntherGerzso'sTowardstheInfinitetopaintingsinwhichthephysical
qualitiesandpeculiaritiesofthemediumitselfseemtohavestartedthe
work, almostindependent of theartist's direction. In Fred Conway'sRiddleandKurtRoeschsOdaliskwestillfeelthepresenceofsubmerged
naturalisticformswhichprovidedabasisfortheexpansionofthefinalorganization,butmorefrequentlythereisnosuchlinkwiththeobjective
world.Thereisanextraordinaryromanticisminthene%vestpaintingsofWiUiamBaziotes,likehisTheSomnambulist,andacombinationofdis-
ciplinedstructurewithmaterialrichness andmultitudinousassociations
inGeromeKamrowskisTheUrgentHour.Thepossibilitiesofanintui-tive,emotionallyliberatedformofexpressionarerevealedvariouslybysuch
paintersasFelixRuvolo,ErieLoran,Gyorg\'Kepes,andRobertMother-well,amongmanyothers.
Butnon-objectiveartcanbeaperilousexpedient,andpresentscertain
difficultieswhicharenotyetsolved.Foronething,thereistheproblem
ofsymbols.Thenon-illustrativeartofthepastgenerallycouldrelyona
widelyacceptedbodyofcon\ictions,availabletoartistandpublicalike,whichprovidedmeaningfulcontentforabstractshapesandrelationships.