FINAL WARNING: A History of the New World Order

(Dana P.) #1

FINAL WARNING: Ready to Spring the Trap


Rockefeller’s Pocantico compound in New York’s Hudson Valley. It
was attended by about 250 individuals who were carefully selected and
screened by Rockefeller and represented the very elite of finance and
industry.

Within a year, after their first full meeting of the Executive Committee
in Tokyo, the Trilateral Commission, considered to be an off-shoot of
the Bilderberger group, was officially initiated, holding biannual
meetings. Because of a heavy cross-membership, some researchers
have said that they appear to be an inner circle of the Council on
Foreign Relations (and also have ties to the Atlantic Institute for
International Affairs, which was established in 1961 as “a sort of public
arm of NATO”), and represent a union of experts and transnational
elite from the three noncommunist industrial regions of the world:
North America, Japan, and Western Europe (excluding Austria, Greece,
and Sweden). Rockefeller saw the need for such a private consultation
among these three democratic areas. With the demise of the Bretton
Woods system, they believed an overhaul was needed. The theory
was, that America’s role should be diminished, and made equal to the
Common Market and Japan, because together, the three represented
70% of the world’s trade.

In 1973, David Rockefeller met with 27 heads of state, including
representatives from the Soviet Union and China; and in 1974, had a
meeting with Pope Paul VI, who afterward called for the nations to form
a world government.

A Trilateral Commission Task Force Report, presented at the 1975
meeting in Kyoto, Japan, called An Outline for Remaking World Trade
and Finance, said: “Close Trilateral cooperation in keeping the peace,
in managing the world economy, and in fostering economic
development and in alleviating world poverty, will improve the chances
of a smooth and peaceful evolution of the global system.” Another
Commission document read: “The overriding goal is to make the world
safe for interdependence by protecting the benefits which it provides
for each country against external and internal threats which will
constantly emerge from those willing to pay a price for more national
autonomy. This may sometimes require slowing the pace at which
interdependence proceeds, and checking some aspects of it. More
frequently however, it will call for checking the intrusion of national
Free download pdf