Graphical Solutions 251
At 6%, (PW of benefits) = (Uniform annual benefit) x (Series present worth factor).
PW of benefits=(Uniform annual benefit)(P/A,6%, 20)
PW of benefits for Alt.A=$410(11.470) =$4703
Alt.B=$639(11.470)=$7329
Alt. C=$700(11.470)-$8029
Figure 8-6 is a plot of the situation; we see that the slope of the line from the origin toAis greater
than the 6% line (NPW=0). Thus therate ofretumfor Ais greater than 6%. For the increment of
additional cost ofBoverA,the slope of lineB-A is greater than the 6% line. This indicates that
the rate of return on theincrement of investmentalso exceeds 6%. But J:4eslope of incrementC-B
indicates its rate of return is less than 6%, b,ence,undesirable. We conclude that the Ainvestment
is satisfactory as well as theB-,-Aincrement; therefore,Bis satisfactory.TheC-B increment is
unsatisfactory; so C is undesirable ip comparison toB. Our decision is to select AlternativeB,
E'IGURE 8-6 Benefit--cost graph for
Example 8-3.
$9000
$8000
$3000 $5000 $7000
PresentWorthof Cost
Further study of the three alternativesof Ex:ample8-3 reveals that Alt.A'suniform annual benefit
was overstated.It is now projected to be $122 rather than $410. Replotthebep.efit-cost graph for
~ this cbanged,situ,<i.tiop. '"~ '= ~ ; em' III~= ~ IB ~,; '" ~ i:i: ""'.>"iI
L -, ,____
I
1
I
'"
ilii1'
1'Ii
.
.1
1'I'
,I
,ql'
I
I
;
\
1
I
.'I!:11
If'
-- -