Engineering Economic Analysis

(Chris Devlin) #1
522 RATIONING CAPITAL AMONG COMPETING PROJECTS

1


Nineindependentprojects are being considered. Figure 17-1may be prepared from the following
data.

SOLUTION

Looking at the nine projects, we see that some are expected to produce a larger rate of return than
others. It is natural that if we are to select from among them, we will pick those with a higher rate
of return. When the projects are arrayed by rate of return, as in Figure 17-1, the correct choice
(of Projects 3, 1,4,5,6, and 2) is readily apparent.

30

f


o 50 150 250 350 450 650 700 - 1000
CumulativeCost of Projects (thousandsof dollars)
FIGURE 1.!7-'lGumulative cost of projects versus rate ofretum.,

1300

... iii' ..r __



Uniform Useful Salvage Computed
Cost Annual Benefit Life Value Rate of
Project (thousands) (thousands) (years) (thousands) Return

1 $100 $23.85 (^10) $ (^0) 20%
2 200 39.85 (^10015)
3 50 34.72 2 0 25
4 100 20.00 6 100 20
5 100 20.00 10 100 20
6 100 18.00 (^1010018)
7 300 94.64 4 0 10
8 300 47.40 10 100 12
9 50 7.00 10 50 14
If a capital budget of $650,000 is available, which projects should be selected?






'-


f-
3 1 4 5 6 2 9 8 7




Free download pdf