Judges often rely on input from psychologists or other
mental health professionals to help them determine
whether guardianship is appropriate. Ideally, family
members or close friends are appointed as guardians,
keeping the ward’s best interests in mind, though this
is not always the case.
Guardianship statutes originate from the doctrine of
parens patriae, which gives to the state the right and
duty to protect people who cannot care for themselves
due to infancy, disability, or incapacity. The request for
guardianship often comes from a family member who
petitions a court to be allowed to make decisions con-
cerning a relative, though public guardians are some-
times appointed to represent the interests of wards who
have no relatives or friends to assume that role. The
appointment of a guardian essentially rescinds an indi-
vidual’s right to independence and self-determination
and can result in the loss of freedom to make decisions
about financial matters, health care, housing, education,
employment, purchases and sales of property, travel,
and marriage and divorce.
Guardianship practices are dictated by state statutes
rather than by federal laws, resulting in subtle differences
in the type and scope of guardianship arrangements,
though nearly all statutes distinguish between protection
of an individual and protection of an estate (in some
jurisdictions, these responsibilities are termed guardian-
shipand conservatorship, respectively) and between full
(or “plenary”) guardians, who make critical decisions in
all realms of a ward’s life, and partial (or “limited”)
guardians, who may act only in restricted domains as
determined by a court. The intent of limited guardianship
is to preserve a ward’s autonomy as much as possible so
that he or she may continue to function independently.
Guardianship of Children
In most jurisdictions, parents of a minor child are the
legal guardians of that child, and they can designate the
person or persons who would replace them in the event
of their death. On occasion, parents are unable to care
for and nurture their children, and the children are
removed from their homes and placed in foster care.
When neither reunification nor adoption appears to be
feasible, alternative permanency options must be
explored. Often, these arrangements involve a relative or
a foster parent assuming the role of legal guardian of the
minor child. In fact, kin care providers make up a large
proportion of appointed guardians of children. Under
ideal circumstances, that arrangement provides a more
stable environment for the child and also allows reten-
tion of connections to the birth family (legal guardian-
ship does not require the termination of parental rights),
which can enhance the general well-being of many
children. If and when their circumstances change, birth
parents can ask a court to vacate guardianship and to
return the child to their custody.
The Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and
Reporting System monitors trends in the guardianship
of children and the characteristics of children trans-
ferred from foster care to guardianship arrangements.
Compared with children who are adopted, those who
become wards tend to be older and are more likely to
be members of a minority group.
Guardianship of Adults
It is estimated that more than 1,250,000 adult citizens
have had guardians appointed on their behalf. An impor-
tant milestone occurs when a young person reaches the
age of majority and parental rights are transferred from
the parent to the child, unless the child has been deemed
incompetent. Family members of disabled or incompe-
tent individuals often petition for guardianship at this
critical juncture. A prime concern is that the ward is
unable to make wise financial decisions. The severity of
the ward’s disability determines the scope of guardian-
ship: Those with only mild impairments are likely to
have a limited guardian, and those with severe impair-
ments are likely to have a full guardian.
As our population ages, the number of adults with
chronic diseases, functional impairments, and dementia
will increase as well. Thus, guardianship is an important
mechanism for protecting older adults who cannot care
for themselves. In assessing the need for guardianship of
an elderly person, a court must decide whether that indi-
vidual has the ability to manage daily activities and to
make important decisions independently. Because the
loss of decisional autonomy can have serious conse-
quences for some elderly wards, affecting their mental
health, sense of personal control, and physical well-being,
some commentators have suggested that guardianship
should always be considered as a last resort.
Psychological Issues
Guardianship raises a number of interesting and complex
psychological issues. The first concerns the difficulty
Guardianship——— 339
G-Cutler (Encyc)-45463.qxd 11/18/2007 12:43 PM Page 339