Exercises 131
Example 13. Let S = {p V q, p V --q, -p v q, --p V -q}. Give a resolution refutation
for S (plus comments, as noted in Example 12 above).
Solution.
Line Proof Step Justification
ro p V q Element of S
rl -pvq Element of S
r2 q Resolvant of ro and rT on p
r3 p v -q Element of S
r4 --p V -q Element of S
r5 -q Resolvant of r3 and r4 on p
r6 F Resolvant of r2 and r5 on q U
A proof method is sound if everything that is provable is true or satisfiable. Here,
that means that for any set S of clauses, if there is a resolution refutation of S, then S is
unsatisfiable.
A proof method is complete if everything that is true is provable. If there is a resolution
refutation of a set of clauses S, then S is not complete, since some things that are not true
are provable-that is, any set of clauses for which there is a resolution refutation.
rn Exercises
- Write DNFs and CNFs corresponding to each of the following truth tables:
(a) p q r Truth Value (b) p q r Truth Value
T T T T T T T F
T T F T T T F T
T F T T T F T F
T F F F T F F T
F T T F F T T F
F T F F F T F F
F F T T F F T T
F F F F F F F T
(c) p q r Truth Value (d) p q r s Truth Value
T T T T T T T T F
T T F T T T F T F
T F T F T T F F T
T F F T T F T F T
F T T F F T T T F
F T F F F T T F T
F F T T F T F T T
F F F F F F F F T