the times | Monday January 3 2022 2GM 27
demand,” Frans Rooijers, director of
the environmental research agency CE
Delft, said. “Those targets must now be
increased to prevent the extra electri-
city demand from being produced by
gas and coal-fired power stations.”
Even before this project, data storage
consumed some 3 per cent of the Neth-
erlands’ electricity, a share that is ex-
pected to rise to more than 10 per cent
by 2030. The issue is fast becoming a
problem across Europe. In Denmark,
where Meta has a major data centre,
15 per cent of energy produced will
power servers by the end of the decade.
Zeewolde council approved the com-
Tourists dangle
for hours in
freezing cable car
Page 30
What would Nicole
say about green
French car adverts?
Page 29
Joe Biden faces the prospect of a
primary challenge from the left wing of
the Democratic Party amid unrest over
his age, poll ratings and failure to push
through his legislative agenda.
The president has entered 2022 in a
vulnerable position, with polling indi-
cating the Republicans are well-placed
to seize control of the House of Repre-
sentatives in November’s midterms.
Biden was dealt a serious blow last
month when Joe Manchin, a Demo-
cratic senator from the conservative
state of West Virginia, all but doomed
the flagship “Build Back Better” plan,
which had been the linchpin of his
domestic agenda. Adding to the uncer-
tainty surrounding the White House is
Biden’s age: he will be 82 shortly after
the 2024 presidential election.
Corbin Trent, co-
founder of the progres-
sive No Excuses pol-
itical action com-
mittee — and
former communi-
cations director
for Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez, a
leading light on
the American left
— told Politico:
“He’s deeply unpop-
ular. He’s old as shit.
He’s largely been inef-
fective. And I think he’ll
probably get demolished in the
midterms. DC is filled with people who
want to be president.”
It is considered unlikely that any
prominent progressive politician would
take the risk of challenging Biden.
Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren,
for example, have wielded significant
Facebook has been hit by anger at plans
to build a giant data centre in the
Netherlands that will use as much
electricity as the nation’s railway
system or a major city.
Meta, the social media giant’s parent
company, said it stipulated that the 410-
acre complex at Zeewolde must be run
from renewable power sources. How-
ever, the plan is rapidly becoming the
biggest headache for the government
because its scale threatens the nation’s
climate change targets.
The server farm for content on Insta-
gram, Facebook, and WhatsApp will
consume 1,380 gigawatt hours of
energy — representing about 10 per
cent of Dutch wind energy production.
“We find it irresponsible to saddle a
future generation with this energy
issue,” said Ben Sonneveld of the Leef-
baar, or “Liveable”, pressure group,
which has eight elected councillors.
“For the energy transition, this
means that there will be considerable
Outcry over Facebook’s Dutch data farm
plex before Christmas. However, the
senate, the country’s upper house of
parliament, has challenged the deci-
sion, meaning the government must
make a final ruling.
It has polarised local politics. Jaap
Lodders, a farming representative, ac-
cused councillors of being “led by
empty promises and commitments that
cannot be substantiated” rather than
the “actual local consequences”.
Mark Rutte, the prime minister, has
promised new rules for data centres but
has also said he wanted to encourage
more foreign investment. He will make
the final decision on the centre as some
of it is to be built on government land.
Hendrik Visser, a Zeewolde council-
lor and supporter of the project, said
such facilities were “simply necessary”
in the 21st century. “They have to go
somewhere.” The centre will create
some 400 jobs. Gerrit Jan Gorter, the
mayor, has accused opponents of the
project of being taken in by “fake news”
and “myths” over energy usage.
“People still believe what’s in the news-
paper,” he said.
North
Sea
NETHERLANDS
Amsterdam
Rotterdam
25 miles
GERMANY
Data centre to
be built here
Zeewolde
Netherlands
Bruno Waterfield Brussels
Hard-left Democrats plot
to unseat ‘failing’ Biden
influence in the president’s administra-
tion. Instead, a challenge could come
from lesser-known candidates with
little to lose. They could include the
former Sanders campaign co-chair-
woman Nina Turner, or Marianne
Williamson, a 2020 presidential hope-
ful who later endorsed Sanders. Joe
Sanberg, an entrepreneur in favour of
raising the minimum wage to $18 an
hour, was another touted as a challen-
ger by Politico, though a spokesman
denied he would consider running.
Any contest would have echoes of
1980, when another struggling Demo-
cratic president, Jimmy Carter, had to
see off a primary challenge from Ted
Kennedy. Carter entered the presiden-
tial election later that year in a weaken-
ed state and lost to Ronald Reagan.
Jeff Weaver, Sanders’ former presi-
dential campaign manager, predicted
that a progressive would emerge to take
on Biden. However, he said this would
not be a “repudiation” of the president
but proof of the party’s shift to the left.
“Progressives are ultimately ascend-
ant,” Weaver said. “And if nothing else,
a progressive running who gets a lot of
support will demonstrate that the ideas
that the progressive movement embra-
ces are, in fact, popular.”
Biden was not the progressive choice
for president but has largely been
praised by the left while in office. He
recently supported making an excep-
tion to the Senate filibuster rules to pass
voting rights legislation, a key issue for
that wing of the party.
Should the president decide not to
run for re-election, it is considered like-
ly that a strong list of progressive candi-
dates would emerge, possibly including
Ocasio-Cortez, who would be 35 and
therefore just old enough to qualify.
Politico reported that progressives
will not stand aside if Biden declines to
run and throws his support behind
Kamala Harris, his vice-president.
Harris has endured her own struggles
with low poll ratings.
United States
Keiran Southern Los Angeles
T
he debating
chamber of
South Africa’s
houses of
parliament has
been destroyed by a fire
that was still burning
last night and was
possibly the result of
arson (Jane Flanagan
writes).
The blaze caused the
roof to collapse, sending
flames leaping skywards,
and the pall of smoke
over Cape Town could
be seen from miles away.
The Hawks, the
country’s priority crime
investigation unit, took
over the inquiry from
police after reports that
the sprinkler system had
been tampered with.
A 51-year-old man is
due to appear in court
tomorrow over the
incident.
The alarm was raised
at 6am yesterday and
soon more than 70
firefighters were in
attendance.
“This is a disastrous
event that should sadden
all of us,” President
Ramaphosa said during
a visit to the site, which
he described as “the
home of our
democracy”.
A spokesman for the
parliament said: “The
entire chamber where
the members sit... has
burnt down.”
Firefighters warned
that other parts of the
parliamentary complex,
which is modelled on the
House of Commons and
dates from the late
1800s, were in danger of
collapse after fierce heat
caused cracking. No
casualities were reported
but historians are
concerned about rare
books and artefacts.
The fire broke out as
the ashes of Archbishop
Desmond Tutu were
being interred at St
George’s Cathedral a few
minutes’ walk away.
A private family service
began at 6am as the
cleric’s remains were
laid to rest.
Tension has been high
in South Africa since
deadly riots swept the
provinces of KwaZulu-
Natal and Gauteng in
July, which Ramaphosa
called “an attempted
insurrection”. Senior
figures in the governing
African National
Congress blamed that
violence on “renegades
with a nefarious agenda”
within their own party.
Fire rips
through
Cape Town
parliament
ELMOND JIYANE/GCIS/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS
Firefighters at the
portico of South
Africa’s parliament.
A man, 51, will appear
in court tomorrow
More than one in three Americans
believe violence against the
government can at times be
justified, a New Year’s Day poll
suggests.
The figure is higher among
Republicans, at 40 per cent, and
independent voters, on 41 per cent,
but only 23 per cent of Democrats
feel that way, according to the
Washington Post-University
of Maryland survey.
The percentage of
American adults
who say violence
is justified in
some
circumstances
has been rising
steadily: in 2015,
a poll found that
23 per cent of
respondents were
in favour while in
2010 the figure was
just 16 per cent.
A majority, 62 per cent,
still believe that violence
against the government can never
be justified, but that number has
dropped since the 1990s, when it
was as high as 90 per cent.
It is almost a year since Donald
Trump supporters, fired up by his
false claims of election fraud,
attacked the US Capitol building
in an attempt to stop the process
formalising Joe Biden’s victory.
Third in US
back violence
against leaders
Keiran Southern
a e ect o.
co-
gres-
ol-
p-
hit.
inef-
nk he’ll
lished in the
led with people who
Was gto
of Maryla
The p
Amer
who
is j
so
ci
h
st
a
23
res
infa
22010 t
jjjjust 16 p
A major
still believe tha
against the governm
Nina Turner, left, a former Bernie
Sanders aide, with Alexandria Ocasio-
Cortez, may challenge Joe Biden