contemporary research into ethology and ecology. Daniel Stern, in
The Interpersonal World of the Infant, has notably explored the pre-
verbal subjective formations of infants. He shows that these are not
at all a matter of ‘stages’ in the Freudian sense, but of levels of sub-
jectivation which maintain themselves in parallel throughout life.
He thus rejects the overrated psychogenesis of Freudian complexes,
which have been presented as the structural ‘Universals’ of subjec-
tivity. Furthermore, he emphasizes the inherently trans-subjective
character of an infant’s early experiences, which do not dissociate
the feeling of self from the feeling of the other. A dialectic between
‘sharable affects’ and ‘non-sharable affects’ thus structures the emer-
gent phases of subjectivity. A nascent subjectivity, which we will
continually find in dreams, délire, creative exaltation, or the feeling
of love ... (Chaosmosis, 6)
Guattari here traces a conception of psychogenesis which is not
structured, like the Freudian one, but singularizing.
In Freud, psychogenesis is represented as the manifestations of
psychic complexes preconstituted by the play of impulses and forms of
repression (and Lacan formalized this play finally by representing it as
a mathème, as a linguistic game, rather than as the magma of psychic
organicism).
Guattari eventualized psychogenesis: psychogenesis is this becom-
ing singular, and the word ‘become’ must then be used in the plural
(‘becomings’) because becomings are projected universes emanating
from singular psychogeneses. This does not, in fact, mean that one
has to deny any cognitive and practical value to Freudian discourse.
Instead, rather than consider it as a description of the universal human
psyche, Guattari proposes to see it as a creation, as a modality of semi-
otization of the unconscious world, as a mythological tale that shapes
and illuminates at the same time.
In the same way that Christians invented a new form of subjectiva-
tion (courtly chivalry and romanticism, a new love, a new nature)
and Bolshevism a new sense of class, the various Freudian sects have
secreted new ways of experiencing – or even of producing – hysteria,
infantile neurosis, psychosis, family conflict, the reading of myths,
etc. (Chaosmosis, 10)
The Freudian model is not understood here as an imperatively
universal model, but as a model of semiotization of intra-individual
124 Thought, Friendship and Visionary Cartography
9780230_221192_12_cha11.pdf 10/3/08 11:36 AM Page 124