Independent researchers like Spencer and Geller were
not alone in being targeted in this way by the Quisling
British elite. Just a couple of years after those writers were
banned from entering the UK, British MPs took a vote on
whether or not Donald Trump (as presidential candidate)
should be banned from entering the UK.^332 British MPs
spent three hours debating this ban, which is more time than
they spent in the previous three decades debating the
industrial entrapment and rape of English girls by gangs of
Muslims in Britain.^333 And the MPs staged this virtue-
signalling debate because during his campaign Trump had
stated that one of his policies for his administration would
be to restrict immigration by Muslims whilst America came
to understand the nature of the threat the country had been
fighting for over twenty years. The man who was British
Prime Minister during most of Trumpʼs campaign, the man
who had compared extreme Muslims with Nazis, intervened
in the American election “claiming Mr Trump was ʻstupid,
divisive and wrongʼ”, whilst more minor MPs called Trump
“crazy”.^334 The Muslim Mayor of London said the well-
travelled 70 year-old billionaire Trump was “ignorant”.^335 It
is against normal etiquette for British politicians to intervene
in the elections in the USA. It is not as though this debate
was some joke on the part of the British MPs: just a few
years earlier a democratically elected politician had been
denied entry to the UK. In 2009 the UK government banned
Geert Wilders, Dutch MP and MEP and leader of the PVV
(The Party for Freedom), from entering the country.^336
Wilders (who has lived under the protection of armed police