articulating some violent form of Islam. When the World
Trade Center collapsed most people did not have internet
access, so whatever this “extreme ideology” is, it was
winning over Muslims before the internet was part of our
lives. There is thus no venue, no medium in general
society where this debate takes place. This means the
British PM must believe that Muslims are hearing (and
believing) that their religion is one of warfare and deceit
in the company of other Muslims. So Muslims are
becoming routinely “radicalized” to hate the surrounding
society by other Muslims (and this hatred is usually
preached out of earshot of non-Muslims). Meanwhile, in
total ignorance of the doctrines and the history of Islam, we
Kuffar are being fooled into allowing Islamic Nazism to
spread across the land and to infiltrate more and more of our
society.
We Kuffar are being treated like sheep, whilst
Muslims are being taught we are to be slaughtered. That
is the implication of what the British Prime Minister has
said. And yet no programme of keeping all mosques under
surveillance was ever put into place by David Cameron. If
this debate is being played out anywhere, it is in the
Mosques and the homes of Muslims. In 1990 the concept of
“extreme Islam” in Britain was the vision of women wearing
the Burka or Niqab. But since “extreme” and “moderate”
are only defined in terms of each other, as the Muslims in
Britain become more extreme (for example, becoming
suicide bombers), then what was previously extreme
(wearing a Burka, the unmistakable uniform of Islamo-
Nazism) becomes accepted as “moderate” and even
dana p.
(Dana P.)
#1