to approve of what the “extremist” says). Once again, it is
simply unimaginable that someone like David Irving would
get this treatment.
Whilst Cameron was chastising university leaders for
looking the other way when Islamo-Nazis came to speak
in their institutions, Cameron did precisely the same,
looking away from the doctrines of Islam and the Muslim
account of how Mohammed rose to military power. The
British PM lied to his Kuffar electorate, telling us Islam was
a religion of peace, when there was not a shred of doctrinal
nor historical evidence to support this ludicrous claim, and
all evidence was to the contrary. Indeed, in making these
claims it is people like David Cameron who should be
accused of revisionism and Holocaust denial, since The
Grand Lie denies the slaughter of untold millions
throughout history in the name of Islam. This revisionist
account of Islam has become the standard position for all
politicians in recent years, even as hundreds of Muslims
were convicted in Britain in order to prevent further
slaughter of Cameronʼs own countrymen. Is this not a
worse form of revisionism than even that of which David
Irving is accused? National Socialism is not currently a
threat to Jews. Indeed, whilst this revisionist account of
Islam was being broadcast by those in the highest positions
of authority, Jews were once again fleeing Europe because
of the terrorist violence from Muslims.^147 So it is arguable
that The Grand Lie is the worst form of revisionism of all,
concealing the Islam-inspired genocides of the past^148 and
the Islam-inspired anti-semitism of the present (the devout
Islamic organisation Hamas has the extermination of the