10 Thursday January 13 2022 | the times
News
In the summer, after a winter in which
flu all but disappeared, Britain’s leading
influenza forecaster made a prediction.
This winter we could, argued John
McCauley, director of the Worldwide
Influenza Centre at the Francis Crick
Institute in London, see a great surge in
flu as the virus attacked a population
that had lost its immunity.
Or we could see a trickle as, starting
from a low base, it failed to take off. Or
we could see something in between.
“Very little would surprise me,” he said.
McCauley was not wrong. The latest
flu surveillance report has found that
despite the worst fears of the NHS,
which was preparing to cope with con-
current Covid-19 and flu waves, the
virus is still at low levels.
Normally, the return of schools in
January is exactly when flu cases would
be surging, adding to the annual winter
pressures of the NHS. Instead, for the
second year in a row, there is almost
none. And not only in this country.
This week McCauley met his col-
leagues around the world and found the
picture was the same. “We haven’t seen
years before in which flu activity has
been so low,” he said.
There’s a bit of a surge in Russia, a
little in Kyrgyzstan and some strange
dynamics in China. Not only is it low in
Flu did not come back to bite us
Tom Whipple Science Editor most of the rest of the world, thanks to
travel restrictions it is not spreading
from where there are hotspots.
In the summer Boris Johnson’
warned of a “rough winter” ahead, with
advisers telling him flu could “come
back to bite us”.
This year, with flu’s millennia-old
rhythms disturbed by global lockdown,
we could not be sure what strain would
predominate, nor how it would behave.
Without having had an annual top-up
of immunity by infection, would flu
cause havoc alongside Covid-19?
Thanks to Omicron we have not
returned to normal. In trying to sup-
press a virus with a high reproductive
number we have easily controlled one
with a far lower number.
McCauley is already looking at what
strains we can expect in the next influ-
enza season, to blunt its virulence.
“It is quite clear that it hasn’t gone
away,” he says. “I will still be concerned
that flu will come and get us next year.”
But this year, mercifully, our worst
fears have not been realised.
Flu away
Percentage of people testing positive
for influenza according to the
Respiratory DataMart system. Flu rates
are still well below pre-pandemic levels
30%
25
20
15
10
5
0
2019
2020
Jan Mar May Jul Oct Dec
2021
Source: UK Health Security Agency
The coronavirus becomes 90 per cent
less infectious after 20 minutes in the
air, a study has found, suggesting that
close contact remains the key route of
transmission.
The research, based on laboratory
experiments, showed that when sus-
pended in aerosols, the virus particles
rapidly lose their ability to infect cells,
especially when humidity is low —
such as in air-conditioned offices.
This implies that ventilation may be
less useful than had been thought in
combating spread. However, other
scientists cautioned that it was not clear
how the findings would translate into
real-world situations, and that they
needed to be squared with the evidence
from superspreading events, in which
infections appeared to occur across a
large area.
The work, by researchers from the
Virus ‘90% less infectious
after 20 minutes in the air’
University of Bristol, involved suspend-
ing a small number of particles in the air
by levitating them between electro-
magnets. In this way the conditions
around them could be controlled and
the virus sampled after different peri-
ods of time. There was a marked and
immediate fall in the infectiousness of
the virus as soon as it entered the air.
The researchers said this informa-
tion was key for monitoring and
preventing coronavirus infections.
When a virus leaves the body in
respiratory particles, those particles
begin to dry out. Dissolved carbon di-
oxide levels also drop, changing the
acidity of the particles.
These two factors make it harder for
the virus to survive. Previous work has
suggested that despite these pressures,
it was possible for the virus to remain
infectious in aerosol for hours. The new
work, published ahead of peer review,
implies that this happens in minutes.
Tom Whipple
Hospitals are reaching their peak of
coronavirus patients, a senior NHS
leader has said on another day of
encouraging data.
The number of people being treated
for Covid-19 in English hospitals has
fallen for two days in a row for the first
time since November, with admissions
peaking or falling in every region out-
side the northeast.
The 16,881 patients in hospital is half
the peak at this time last year and 2,
fewer than the peak in the first wave in
April 2020.
Matthew Taylor, head of the NHS
Confederation of hospital bosses, said:
“Unless things change unexpectedly,
we are close to the national peak of
Covid patients in hospital. This is a
significant moment.”
Taylor has been one of the more
cautious NHS leaders and emphasised
that some parts of the health service
were still experiencing rising pressure.
“Some parts of UK are still seeing rising
patient numbers alongside staff
absence,” he said. “One northern trust,
for example, told us it doesn’t expect to
reach its peak in hospitalisation for ten
more days.”
Discharging patients from hospital
has been an issue in recent days after
admissions stopped rising in all but one
region. In London they have fallen by a
fifth since New Year’s Eve and hospital
admission rates are well below those in
the north. They are highest in the
northwest, at 5.1 per 100,000, but this
has not risen for a week. Admission
rates are lowest in the southeast and
southwest of England, at 2.3 per
100,000 — both largely flat during the
past week.
Jeremy Hunt, the former health
secretary, said: “It does feel like sun-
shine is edging through the clouds.” He
wrote in his weekly email: “There is a
general sense that we are past the peak
and the NHS will just about get through
it. The number of hospital admissions
has increased quite sharply but is still
only about half the peak of a year ago.”
A consultant on the frontline has
backtracked on predictions that the
NHS would be overwhelmed this win-
ter and said it was looking increasingly
likely that the country could ride out
the Omicron wave.
Richard Cree, an intensive care con-
sultant at the James Cook University
Hospital in Middlesbrough, had feared
that the number of patients being ad-
mitted would be higher due to the latest
coronavirus variant. This week he said
things were not as bad as he initially
thought. Writing on his nomore-
surgeons.com blog, Cree said: “The
number of people being admitted
hasn’t risen as high as I feared it might
and it may even be starting to plateau. I
will admit that I thought things might
be worse by now but I’m all too happy to
be proved wrong.”
Boris Johnson said that high vaccine
uptake had allowed England to get
through the Omicron wave without
significant restrictions. “That is the
reason that we now have one of the
most open economies, if not the most
open economy, in Europe,” he added.
Confirmed cases have been falling in
the past week, but there is uncertainty
over whether this is linked to testing de-
lays and post-Christmas backlogs. The
representative survey by the Office for
National Statistics, considered the
most reliable, reported that overall in-
fections rose in the first week of Janu-
ary but by less than the week before. It
estimated that 4.3 million people in the
UK had the virus, up by 15 per cent on
the previous week, compared with a
rise of 64 per cent the week before that.
Covid relief for health chiefs as
News Coronavirus
Chris Smyth Whitehall Editor
Katie Gibbons
The national picture
How Britain compares
How many are in hospital?
There are 19,735 patients being treated in
hospital. 793 patients are on ventilators. An
additional 2,049 patients have been
admitted, up 5.2 per cent in the seven days to
January 8 when this data was last updated
Hospital admissions
Seven-day average
How does 2021 compare?
There were 8,477 deaths from all causes
recorded in England and Wales in the week
to December 31, of which the coronavirus
accounted for 6.9 per cent. The number of
weekly deaths was 523 higher than the
five-year average for the same time of year
Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct
0
5,
10,
15,
20,
2020/
Five-year average
Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan
0
50,
100,
150,
200,
How many people have Covid-19?
There were 129,587 new cases reported
yesterday, bringing the total so far to
14,862,138 or 222.5 for every 1,000 people
Daily cases
19% decrease from seven days ago
(based on seven-day moving average)
National
R number
Seven-day 1.2 to 1.
average
How many have died?
Yesterday, there were 398 deaths reported,
bringing the total number of deaths in the
past seven days to 1,724. The rolling
average number of daily deaths is 246.3,
up from 170.7 a day a week ago
Deaths
Seven-day average
Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan
0
1,
2,
3,
4,
Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan
0
500
1,
1,
Figures as of 6pm yesterday Source: Our World in Data (latest figures available) and gov.uk. Note: Selected countries
Percentage of population who have received at least one vaccine dose
(total doses administered in brackets)
Daily (Jan 11)
First dose 19,
Boosters (Jan 11)
139,
Second 47.8m
Second 28,
Total 36m
First dose 52.0m
People vaccinated
in the UK
99.0% (22.9m)
90.6% (19.9m)
87.4% (1.1m)
85.8% (85.7m)
83.9% (72.1m)
81.3% (117m)
79.8% (44.4m)
78.9% (128.9m)
76.5% (135.7m)
UAE
Portugal
Malta
Spain
Canada
Italy
Australia
France
UK