Use of wild fish and other aquatic organisms as feed in aquaculture in the Asia-Pacific 95
TABLE 11Estimated production (thousand tonnes) of cultured marine finfish species in Asia-Pacific for 2010 based on 10, 15 and 20 perce
nt increments and the corresponding prediction
on the estimated trash fish/low-value fish usage (ETFU) for each species group at conversion efficiency of 6 and 10
*
Species
Trash fish/low-value fish usage (%)
Estimated production and
corresponding
TF/LV fish use in
2004
Predicted production (at 10, 15 and 20% increments) and corresponding increase in TF/LV fish use in 2010
Estimated usage in
2004
Pr
edicted
usage in
2010
Production
ETFU
+10%
ETFU
+15%
ETFU
+20%
ETFU
6
10
6
10
6
10
6
10
Barramundi
40
20
25
60
99
27
33
55
29
34
57
30
36
60
Amberjack, mackerel, etc
0
0
169
0
0
186
0
0
194
0
0
202
0
0
Flatfishes
0
0
103
0
0
113
0
0
118
0
0
123
0
0
Cobia
30
15
20
37
61
23
20
34
24
21
35
25
22
37
Seabasses
10
5
110
66
110
121
36
61
127
38
63
132
40
66
Seabream
10
5
165
99
165
181
54
91
190
57
95
198
59
99
Snappers
50
25
4
13
22
5
7
12
5
7
12
5
8
13
Groupers
80
40
58
278
464
64
153
255
67
160
267
70
167
278
Other marine finfish species
50
25
370
1 110
1 849
407
610
1 017
426
639
1 063
444
666
1 110
Total
1 024
1 663
2 770
1 127
913
1 525
1 180
956
1 592
1 229
998
1 663
*The production obtained in “tuna fattening” is not included.Source:
Estimated use of trash fish/low-value fish and fish production for 2004 were adapted from Table 10.