Fish as feed inputs for aquaculture: practices, sustainability and implications

312 Fish as feed inputs for aquaculture – Practices, sustainability and implications

TABLE 16

Production of fishmeal and canned fish from pelagic species in Chile (thousand tonnes)

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Total pelagic fish

landing 7 096 6 414 5 560 3 041 4 576 4 868 3 516 4 032 3 368 4 477 3 577

Fishmeal 1 553 1 399 1 225 643 1 000 877 778 843 705 988 827

Canned fish 73 66 104 105 97 101 98 276 105 105 99

Percent fishmeal 22 22 22 21 22 18 22 21 21 22 23

Percent canned fish 1.0 1.0 1.9 3.4 2.1 2.1 2.8 6.9 3.1 2.4 2.8

Source: SERNAPESCA (2006)

Source: SERNAPESCA (2006)

FIGURE 23

Production (tonnes) of fresh chilled fish, 2005

493

(<1%)

181 639

(93%)

13 828

(7%)

Pelagic fish Aquaculture Other fish

FIGURE 24

Production (tonnes) of canned pelagic fish

processed from main species, 2005

Source: SERNAPESCA (2006)

4 820

(5%)

94 410

(95%)

60

(<1%)

Chub mackerel Jack mackerel Sardines

Source: SERNAPESCA (2006)

FIGURE 22

Relative proportion of fishmeal and frozen fish

produced from the total landing, 1995–2005

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Percent

% Fishmeal % Frozen fish

TABLE 15
Production of canned fish from pelagic species, 1995–2005 (thousand tonnes)
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Anchoveta 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Chub mackerel 1 0 1 1 1 1 5 3 5 12 5
Jack mackerel 60 63 99 103 95 99 92 273 100 94 94
Sardines 11 2 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Total 73 66 104 105 97 101 98 276 105 105 99
Source: SERNAPESCA (2006)