The Economist - USA (2022-01-22)

(Antfer) #1

64 Finance&economics TheEconomistJanuary22nd 2022


more precisely targeted. After Omicron in­
fections  were  discovered  in  Shanghai,  for
example,  the  authorities  raised  the  “risk”
level (which entails tightened restrictions
on movement) not for the entire city or an
entire  district,  but  for  zones  as  small  as  a
bubble tea shop, where three workers were
infected. “Zero­covid has maybe 1,000 fac­
es  in  1,000  cities”,  says  one  analyst,  de­
pending  on  the  resources  each  place  can
lavish on the strategy.
The  more  immediate  economic  threat
posed  by  Omicron  is  not  to  foreign  cus­
tomers but to China’s own consumers. In­
termittent restrictions on travel and gath­
erings  have  hampered  retail  spending,
which grew by only 1.7% in nominal terms
in December, compared with a year earlier,
and  shrank,  after  adjusting  for  inflation.
Goldman  Sachs,  a  bank,  thinks  further
lockdowns  this  year  could  cut  a  full  per­
centage  point  off  growth  in  household
consumption.  It  has  lowered  its  growth
forecast  for  gdp as  a  whole  from  4.8%  to
4.3%, below the government’s target.
China’s  recent  economic  momentum
has  also  suffered  from  coal  shortages,  en­
vironmental  limits  on  energy  intensity,
regulatory  crackdowns  on  consumer­fac­
ing  tech  companies,  and  strict  curbs  on
borrowing  by  property  developers,  which
forced several to default, shaking the con­
fidence of homebuyers. In curling, skaters
frantically sweep debris and other impedi­
ments out of the stone’s way to smooth its
passage  across  the  ice.  In  China,  policy­
makers  have  been  doing  the  opposite,
sweeping one regulatory obstacle after an­
other into the economy’s path. 
What  explains  this  regulatory  zeal?
After  the  economy  bounced  back  quickly
from  the  first  wave  of  the  pandemic,  Chi­
na’s  policymakers  may  have  concluded
that it was a good time to curb some of the
negative  side­effects  of  growth,  such  as
pollution  and  property  speculation.  Eco­
nomic  momentum  seemed  assured.  Ex­
ports  in  particular  boomed  as  people
around the world spent less on face­to­face
services during the pandemic and more on

goodstokeepthemsafe(masks),slim(ex­
ercisebikes)andsane(gamesconsoles).
Butthisexternalsourceofgrowthmay
ebbover2022.Foreignersareunlikelyto
splash out again onthehomecomforts
thatgotthemthroughrecentlockdowns
(seenextstory).Customerswhoboughta
games console or exercise bike in 2021
probablywillnotneedanupgradesoon.
Moreover,forChina’sexportstogrowfrom
their current levels, the splurge would
havetobeincreased,notmerelyrepeated.
Somewhat belatedly, policymakers
havenowrealisedthatgrowthneedsstabi­
lising.OnJanuary17thChina’scentralbank
cuttheinterestrateonitsone­yearloans
from2.95%to 2.85%.That wasfollowed
dayslaterbya fallinthereferenceratesfor
bank loans. These reductions follow a cut
last month in the reserve requirements im­
posed on banks.
The  government  is  also  easing  fiscal
policy. It has extended income­tax breaks,
including  favourable  treatment  for  year­
end  bonuses.  It  is  encouraging  local  gov­
ernments  to  issue  more  “special”  bonds
(which  are  meant  to  be  repaid  out  of  rev­
enues  from  the  infrastructure  projects
they finance). It is also hastening construc­
tion  of  102  infrastructure  “mega­projects”
outlined in the country’s five­year plan for
2021­25.  China’s  state  grid  will,  for  exam­
ple,  build  13  ultra­high­voltage  transmis­
sion lines in 2022. Increased infrastructure
investment could add at least a percentage
point  to  gdpgrowth  in  the  first  half  of
2022, according to Morgan Stanley, a bank.
Analysts at Morgan Stanley are relative­
ly  confident  about  the  government’s
chances  of  meeting  its  growth  target  this
year, as long as policymakers bring about a
soft landing for the property market. Home
sales fell by almost 18% in December, com­
pared  with  a  year  before.  To  arrest  this
trend, government officials have tried hard
to reassure homebuyers that the flats they
have bought in advance will be built, even
if  the  developer  that  sold  them  goes  bust.
Mortgage rates are edging downwards. And
a number of cities have experimented with
subsidies and tax cuts to encourage home­
buying.  Rosealea  Yao  of  Gavekal  Drago­
nomics,  a  consultancy,  thinks  sales  will
improve in the first quarter compared with
the previous three months.
But although China’s national rulers are
now  committed  to  stabilising  the  econ­
omy, they are still wary of overstimulating
property, which is prone to worrying spec­
ulative  bubbles.  Beijing  wants  local  gov­
ernments to do enough, but not too much.
After  the  northern  province  of  Heilong­
jiang promised an “all­out sprint” to revive
the  property  market,  the  exhortation  was
soon  removed  from  the  internet,  points
out  Ms  Yao.  The  measuredart  of  curling,
not  sprinting,  is  thebettermetaphor  for
the government’s aims.n

It’s less fun at home
China, % increase on a year earlier*

Source:RefinitivDatastream *From March



40

30

20

10

0
2021

Retailsales
Nominalterms
40

30

20

10

0
2021

Exports of goods
$ terms

Supplysnarls

Chain reactions


T


he generalpublic  learned  far  more
about  supply  chains  last  year  than  it
probably cared to. A host of disruptions to
production  and  shipping  interacted  with
soaring demand for goods to produce bare
shelves  and  rising  prices.  Although  goods
have  been  in  short  supply,  the  number  of
measures  tracking  supply­chain  woes  has
proliferated  at  an  impressive  pace  in  re­
cent months. All paint a picture of histori­
cally high levels of disruptions, and an un­
certain path ahead. 
One gauge is an “ocean timeliness indi­
cator”, published by Flexport, an American
logistics  firm.  This  reports  how  long  it
takes a shipment to move from the suppli­
er’s warehouse to the departure gate of the
destination port, for two big freight routes
out of China: to Europe and America. Three
years  ago  the  journey  to  Europe  took  just
under 60 days, and that to America just un­
der 50. Travel times then rose steadily after
the pandemic struck. But the trends for the
two  routes  have  diverged  a  little  in  recent
months.  Shipping  times  to  Europe  have
fallen  from  above  110  days  down  to  108.
Transport  to  America,  at  114  days’  total
journey  time,  takes  longer  than  ever  (see
chart on next page, left­hand panel).
A global supply­chain pressures index,
compiled  from  a  variety  of  indicators  by
economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of
New  York,  tells  much  the  same  story.  Be­

WASHINGTON, DC
Just how gummed up are global
supply chains?

Ever delayed
Free download pdf