The Economist January 22nd 2022 Culture 77
Venturecapital
Risky business
N
oteveryoneisa fanofventurecapi
talists(vcs).Oneacademicfamously
questioned whetherthey were “soulless
agentsofSatan,orjustclumsyrapists?”
PaulGraham,thecofounderoftheY Com
binator startup incubator, published a
“unifiedtheoryofvcsuckage”,inwhichhe
likenedtheindustry’sinvestmentprocess
toa bodycavitysearchbysomeonewitha
faultyknowledgeofanatomy.Venturecap
italists,heconcluded, resembled classic
villains: “alternately cowardly, greedy,
sneakyandoverbearing”.
Morerecently,vcshavebeenblamed
forpropagatingsomeoftheillsofBigTech:
themonopolisation ofmarkets,theero
sion of privacy and the degradation of
workers’rightsinthegigeconomy.Byprio
ritising growth over governance at all
costs,theystandaccusedoffeedinga reck
lessly aggressive capitalist culture that
contributedtoscandalsatUber,WeWork
andTheranos.
In“ThePowerLaw”,SebastianMallaby
acknowledges some of the industry’s
shortcomings,mostnotablyitsshocking
lackofdiversity.Buthezealouslydefends
theoverallachievementsofthevcindus
try,whichhasfundedmanyofthemodern
world’smostusefulinventions(searchen
gines,smartphones, vaccines),disrupted
cosymonopoliesandgeneratedeyepop
pingwealth.Heevenclaimsthatvcs have
emergedas a“thirdgreat institutionof
moderncapitalism”,combiningtheorga
nisationalstrengthsofcompanieswiththe
flexibilityofmarkets.Littlesurprisethat
thevcmodelhasnowgoneglobal,with
particularlystrikingresultsinChina.
Inhiswellresearchedbook,leavened
bylively portraitsofleadingfigures,Mr
Mallabyexploresthehistoryofthevcin
dustryandthereasonsforitsvitality.A
journalistatTheEconomistinthe1980s90s
(and husband of the current editorin
chief ),hepreviouslywrotea studyofthe
hedgefund industry and an acclaimed
biographyofAlanGreenspan.
SomehistoriesofSiliconValley,suchas
MargaretO’Mara’s “TheCode”, haveem
phasisedtheimportanceofAmericanmil
itaryspendinginseedingthewestcoast
techindustry.MrMallaby’sfocusisover
whelminglyontheentrepreneurs,inves
torsandfirmsthatnurtureditsgrowth.
Muchofthevcindustry’ssuccessisattrib
utedtoitsmentality.Inevaluatinginvest
ments,vcs stilltakeafterthepioneering
ArthurRock,whozeroedinonthe“intel
lectualbookvalue”ofacompanyrather
thanthefinancialkind.They acceptex
tremefinancialrisk,embraceimmigrants
andtolerate nerdsandmisfits, who ac
count for somany successfulentrepre
neurs.FourofPayPal’ssixearlyemployees
reputedlybuiltbombsinhighschool.
Whilevcs lovebackingcompaniesthat
enjoysocallednetworkeffects,theybene
fitfromtheirownversionofthisphenom
enon,too.SandHillRoad,wheremanyof
the leading vcfirmsare clustered,may
havetheairofa rowofgentlemen’sclubs
butit hasenabledthefreeflowofideas,fa
voursandconnections.Thatispartlywhy
theSiliconValleymodelhasbeensohard
toreplicateelsewhere.
Astheauthordescribes,thevcworld
hasexperiencedconsiderablechurninthe
past 60 yearsandhaslatelybeendisrupted
asmuchasithasbeendisruptive.Capital
richoutsiders,includingdstGlobal,Soft
BankandTigerGlobalManagement,have
allmuscledinonwhatwasoncea cottage
industry.Bydeployingmassesofmoney
laterintheinvestmentcycle,theseindul
gentnewcomershaveenabledstartupsto
delaylistingonpublicmarkets.InMrMal
laby’sview,thattrendpartlyaccountsfor
the misgovernance at some scandal
riddentechcompaniesbecauseithascut
thetiesbetweeninterventionistvcinves
torsandfreewheelingentrepreneurs.
Some westcoast vc firms, such as
SequoiaCapitalandAndreessenHorowitz,
haverespondedtothenewchallengersby
raisingeverbiggerfundsanddiversifying,
both geographically and sectorally. This
hasonlyfuelledtalkthatSandHillRoadis
becomingthenewWallStreet.Yeteventhe
biggest traditionalvcfirms remain tiny
comparedwithgiantpublicmarketfunds.
Someinvestorswonderwhytheyshould
botherwithriskyvcbetswhenthereturns
inpublicmarketscanbesospectacular.
Take Apple, which recently popped
above $3trn in market value compared
withthe$1.8bnitwasworthwhenitfloat
edin1980.Itseemsimprobablethatthevc
industry,whichhashelpedsomanystart
upsto“blitzscale”,caneverdosoitself. n
A history of the venture-capital industry defends its contribution to capitalism
The Power Law. By Sebastian Mallaby.
Penguin Press; 496 pages; $30.
Allen Lane; £25
................................................................
John Thornhill
We identify the reviewers of books connected to
The Economistor its staff. Mr Thornhill is Innovation
Editor of the Financial Times.
Hip-hoprevolutionaries
Hearing lessons
T
hesubtitleofthisbiographyof the
hiphop producer James Yancey—Jay
Dee, J Dilla—makes the claim that he “rein
vented rhythm”. To test that bold assertion,
launch a streaming service and cue up the
album “Voodoo”, by D’Angelo, released in
- Once the opening track, “Playa Pla
ya”, reaches its groove, around 90 seconds
in, try tapping your fingers against your
thigh in time with the bassline.
You’ll find it almost impossible. Pino
Palladino, the bassist, thought that the
rhythm sounded “wobbly”. The notes fall
in the wrong places—on the wrong beat in
the bar or moved slightly in time, just be
fore or behind where the ear expects them
to be. The effect is to make the music feel
woozy and destabilising.
What you’re hearing is “Dilla time”,
which, Dan Charnas argues fairly convinc
ingly, reshaped the sound of hiphop—and
thus the sound of pop—its wrongness add
ing a human element to music that had
previously been focused on mechanical
precision. Mr Charnas’s book attempts to
be more than a biography: interpolated
between its chapters on Dilla’s life are oth
ers that explain how musical time works,
and how Dilla interpreted it in the tracks he
made for himself and as a producer and
inspiration for others.
“Dilla Time” is at its best when the two
strands come together; in the section on
Dilla Time.By Dan Charnas. MCD;
480 pages; $30 and £23.99