Section 10–7 / Design of Control Systems with Observers 791Outputyt (sec)Unit-Step Response of
(2.2655s^2 + 40.779s + 256)/(s^5 + 18s^4 + 114s^3 + 320s^2 + 416s + 256)0.60.811.21.40.40.20
012345678910Figure 10–32
The unit-step
response of the
system shown in
Figure 10–31. (The
closed-loop poles for
pole placement are
ats=–1;j,
s=–8.The observer
poles are at s=–4,
s=–4.)
Comments. We considered two possible configurations for the closed-loop control
systems using observer controllers. As stated earlier, other configurations are possible.
The first configuration, which places the observer controller in the feedforward path, gen-
erally gives a fairly large overshoot. The second configuration, which places the observer con-
troller in the feedback path, gives a smaller overshoot. This response curve is quite similar to
that of the system designed by the pole-placement approach without using the observer con-
troller. See the unit-step response curve of the system, shown in Figure 10–33, designed by
the pole-placement approach without observer. Here the desired closed-loop poles used are
s=- 1 +j, s=- 1 - j, s=- 8
Outputyt (sec)Unit-Step Response of System without Observer0.60.811.21.40.40.20
012345678910Figure 10–33
The unit-step
response of the
control system
designed by the pole
placement approach
without observer.
(The closed-loop
poles are at
s=– 1 ;j, s=–8.)