D. Modeling strategy: AllEs, noCs
Model: Logit PðXÞ¼aþ~
q
i¼ 1
biEiþ~
q
i¼ 1
~
q
i^0 ¼ 1
i 6 ¼i^0
d*ii 0 EiEi^0
Step 1: Define initial model (above)
Step 2: Assess interaction involvingEs.
Option A*: Overall chunk test forEEs,
followed by backward elimination of
EEs
Option B*: Skip chunk test forEEs; start
with backward elimination ofEEs
Skip previous Step 3
Step 4: Test for nonsignificantEs if not
components of significantEEs
E. How causal diagrams can influence choice of
initial model?
III. Screening Variables (pages 263–270)
A. Problem Focus: Model contains oneE, and a large
number ofCs andECs,butcomputer program
does not run or fitted model unreliable (“large” p)
B. Screening: Exclude someCjone-at-a-time; fit
reduced model
C. Method 0:Consider predictors one-at-a-time;
screen-out thoseXinot significantly associated
with the outcome (D)
D. Questions and Brief Answers about Method 0:
- Any criticism? Yes: does not consider
confounding or interaction involvingCs - Depends on types ofXs? Yes: use if onlyEs
and noCs. - How largekcompared ton? No good answer.
- Other ways than Method 0? Yes: evaluate
confounding and/or interaction forCs. - Collinearity and/or screening? Consider
collinearity prior to and following screening.
E. Assessing Confounding and Interaction when
Screening C variables.
Confounding: Compare Logit P(X)¼aþbEwith
Logit P(X)¼aþbEþgC
DoesdORDE¼e
^b
6 ¼dORDEjC¼e
^b*
?
Interaction: TestH 0 :d¼0 for the model Logit
P(X)¼aþbEþgCþdEC
F. How to proceed if severalEs and severalCs: It
depends!
G. How to proceed if severalEs and noCs: Use
method 0.
Detailed Outline 287