- For SOC¼1, SBP¼150, and SMK¼1, X¼(SOC,
SBP, SMK, SOCSBP, SOCSMK)¼(1, 150, 1, 150, 1)
and
Model 1 ;P^ðXÞ¼ 1 =ð 1 þexpf½ 1 : 18 0 : 52 ð 1 Þ
þ 0 : 04 ð 150 Þ 0 : 56 ð 1 Þ
0 : 033 ð 1 150 Þ 0 : 175 ð 1 1 ÞgÞ:
¼ 1 =f 1 þexp½ð 1 : 035 Þg
¼ 1 =ð 1 þ 2 : 815 Þ
¼ 0 : 262 - ForModel 2, person 1(SOC¼1, SMK¼1, SBP¼150):
^PðXÞ¼ 1 =ð 1 þexpf½ 1 : 19 0 : 50 ð 1 Þ
þ 0 : 01 ð 150 Þ 0 : 42 ð 1 ÞgÞ
¼ 1 =f 1 þexp½ð 0 : 61 Þg
¼ 1 =ð 1 þ 1 : 84 Þ
¼ 0 : 352
ForModel 2, person2(SOC¼0,SMK¼1, SBP¼150):
^PðXÞ¼ 1 =ð 1 þexpf½ 1 : 19 0 : 50 ð 0 Þ
þ 0 : 01 ð 150 Þ 0 : 42 ð 1 ÞgÞ
¼ 1 =f 1 þexp½ð 0 : 11 Þg
¼ 1 =ð 1 þ 1 : 116 Þ
¼ 0 : 473 - The risk computed forModel 1is 0.262, whereas the
risk computed forModel 2, person 1is 0.352. Note that
both risks are computed for the same person (i.e.,
SOC¼1, SMK¼1, SBP¼150), yet they yield
different values because the models are different. In
particular,Model 1contains two product terms that
are not contained in Model 2, and consequently,
computed risks for a given person can be expected to
be somewhat different for different models. - UsingModel 2results,
RRð1vs: 2 Þ¼
PðSOC¼ 0 ;SMK¼ 1 ;SBP¼ 150 Þ
PðSOC¼ 1 ;SMK¼ 1 ;SBP¼ 150 Þ
¼ 0 : 352 = 0 : 473 ¼ 1 = 1 : 34 ¼ 0 : 744
This estimated risk ratio is less than 1 because the risk
for high social class persons (SOC¼1) is less than the
risk for low social class persons (SOC¼0) in this data
set. More specifically, the risk for low social class
persons is 1.34 times as large as the risk for high social
class persons.
38 1. Introduction to Logistic Regression