- logit PðXÞ¼aþb 1 Fþb 2 BASEþg 1 POST
 þg 2 PFþg 3 OCCþg 4 AGEþg 5 GEN
 þd 1 FBASEþd 2 FPOST
 þd 3 FPFþd 4 FOCCþd 5 FAGE
 þd 6 FGENþd 7 BASEPOST
 þd 8 BASEPFþd 9 BASEOCC
 þd 10 BASEAGEþd 11 BASEGEN
- F 3 POST:EV
F 3 BASE:EE
POST 3 BASE:EV
PF 3 POST:Neither
BASE 3 PF:EV
- Choicescanddare reasonable.
Choiceais not reasonable because the two
nonsignificant chunk tests do not imply that the
overall chunk test is nonsignificant; in fact, the overall
chunk test was significant.
Choicebis not reasonable because the corresponding
chunk test wasmoresignificant than the chunk test
for interaction terms involving BASE.
- Using the model of question 2 ,
 H 0 :d 2 ¼d 3 ¼d 4 ¼d 5 ¼d 6 ¼0.
 LR¼2lnLReduced(2lnLFull)approxw^25
 underH 0 ,
 where the Full Model is the model of question 2 , and
 the Reduced Model does not contain the product
 termsF 3 POST, F 3 PF, F 3 OCC, F 3 AGE, and
 FGEN.
- PF, AGE,andGENare eligible to be dropped from the
 model. These variables areVvariables that are not
 components of the three product terms found
 significant from interaction assessment.
- No. The variablesPOSTandOCCare lower order
 components of the product termsF 3 POSTand
 BASE 3 OCCfound significant, and are therefore to
 be retained in the model (from the hierarchy
 principle). Tests of significance forPOSTandOCC
 will depend on the coding of the variables in the
 model, so such tests are inappropriate, since they
 should be independent of coding.
- a. logit PðXÞ¼aþb 1 Fþb 2 BASEþg 1 POSTþg 2 PF
 þg 3 OCCþg 4 AGEþg 5 GEN
 þd 1 FBASEþd 2 FPOST
 þd 9 BASEOCC
 b. X*¼(3, 1, POST, PF, OCC, AGE, GEN), whereas
 X¼(2, 0, POST, PF, OCC, AGE, GEN),
 so
 OR¼exp½b 1 þb 2 þ 3 d 1 þd 2 POSTþd 9 OCC
Chapter 8 677