502 Social Conflict, Harmony, and Integration
Confronting racism: The problem and the response(pp. 3–32).
Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Bachman, B. A. (2001). Racial bias
in organizations: The role of group processes in its causes and
cures. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and re-
search(pp. 415–444). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kafati, G. (2000). Group identity
and intergroup relations: The Common In-Group Identity Model.
In S. R. Thye, E. J. Lawler, M. W. Macy, & H. A. Walker (Eds.),
Advances in group processes(Vol. 17, pp. 1–34). Stamford, CT:
JAI.
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Validzic, A. (1998). Intergroup
bias: Status, differentiation, and a common in-group identity.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75,109–120.
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Validzic, A., Matoka, K., Johnson, B.,
& Frazier, S. (1997). Extending the benefits of re-categorization:
Evaluations, self-disclosure and helping.Journal of Experimen-
tal Social Psychology, 33,401–420.
Duckitt, J. (1992). Psychology and prejudice: A historical analy-
sis and integrative framework. American Psychologist, 47,
1182–1193.
Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2001). The impact of relative group
status: Affective, perceptual, and behavioral consequences. In R.
Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social
psychology: Intergroup processes(pp. 324–343). Malden, MA:
Blackwell.
Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L.
(2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group
competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of
Social Issues, 57, 389–412.
Esses, V. M., Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. (1993). Values, stereotypes,
and emotions as determinants of intergroup attitudes. In D.
Mackie & D. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition and stereotyp-
ing: Interactive processes in group perception(pp. 137–166).
San Diego, CA: Academic.
Esses, V. M., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (1998). Intergroup
competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration:
An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social
Issues, 54,699–724.
Ferguson, C. K., & Kelley, H. H. (1964). Significant factors in over-
evaluation of own groups’ products. Journal of Abnormal and
Social Psychology, 69,223–228.
Fiske, S. T. (2000). Interdependence and the reduction of prejudice.
In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination
(pp. 115–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum
model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual
process theories in social psychology(pp. 231–254). New York:
Guilford.
Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of im-
pression formation: From category based to individuating
processes as a function of information, motivation, and attention.
In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psy-
chology(Vol. 23, pp. 1–74). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Fiske, S. T., & Ruscher, J. B. (1993). Negative interdependence
and prejudice: Whence the affect? In D. M. Mackie & D. L.
Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Inter-
active processes in group perception (pp. 239–268). New York:
Academic.
Gaertner, L., & Insko, C. A. (2000). Intergroup discrimination in the
minimal group paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation, or fear?
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79,77–94.
Gaertner, L., & Schopler, J. (1998). Perceived ingroup entitativity
and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others. Euro-
pean Journal of Social Psychology, 28,963–980.
Gaertner, S. L., Bachman, B. A., Dovidio, J. D., & Banker, B. S.
(2001). Corporate mergers and stepfamily marriages: Identity,
harmony, and commitment. In M. A. Hogg & D. Terry (Eds.),
Social identity in organizations (pp. 265–282). Oxford, UK:
Blackwell.
Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of
racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice,
discrimination, and racism(pp. 61–89). Orlando, FL: Academic.
Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias:
The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Philadelphia, PA:
Psychology Press.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., &
Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recat-
egorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe &
M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology
(Vol. 4. pp. 1–26). New York: Wiley.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Bachman, B. A. (1996). Revisiting
the Contact Hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup
identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,
20 (3&4), 271–290.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B., Houlette, M., Johnson,
K., & McGlynn, E. (2000). Reducing intergroup conflict: From
superordinate goals to decategorization, recategorization, and
mutual differentiation. Group Dynamics, 4,98–114.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Rust, M. C., Nier, J., Banker, B.,
Ward, C. M., Mottola, G. R., & Houlette, M. (1999). Reducing
intergroup bias: Elements of intergroup cooperation. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 76,388–402.
Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J. A., Dovidio, J. F., Murrell, A. J., & Pomare,
M. (1990). How does cooperation reduce intergroup bias?Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 59,692–704.
Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., &
Anastasio, P. A. (1996). The Contact Hypothesis: The role of a
common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias among
majority and minority group members. In J. L. Nye & A. M.
Brower (Eds.), What’s social about social cognition?(pp. 230–
360). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary
statement.American Sociological Review, 25,161–178.