References 505dominance theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimen-
tal social psychology(Vol. 31, pp. 191–263). San Diego, CA:
Academic.
Pratto, F., & Lemieux, A. (2001). The psychological ambiguity of
immigration and its implications for selling immigration policy.
Journal of Social Issues, 57,413–430.
Pratto, F., & Shih, M. (2000). Social dominance orientation and
group context in implicit group prejudice. Psychological Sci-
ence, 11,515–518.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994).
Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting
social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 67,741–763.
Rabbie, J. M., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (1996). A behavioral
interaction model: Toward an integrative theoretical framework
for studying intra- and intergroup dynamics. In E. H. Witte & J. H.
Davis (Eds.),Understanding group behavior: Vol. 2. Small group
processes and interpersonal relations: Understanding group
behavior(pp. 255–294). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rabbie, J. M., & Schot, J. C. (1990). Group behavior in the minimal
group paradigm: Fact or fiction? In P. J. D. Drenth, J. A.
Sergeant, & R. J. Takens (Eds.), European perspectives in psy-
chology: Vol. 3. Work and organizational, social and economic,
cross-cultural(pp. 251–263). New York: Wiley.
Rouhana, N. N., & Kelman, H. C. (1994). Promoting joint thinking
in international conflicts: An Israeli-Palestinian continuing
workshop.Journal of Social Issues, 50(1), 157–178.
Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (1998). Social Identity Theory’s self-
esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarifica-
tion.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2,40–62.
Schopler, J., & Insko, C. A. (1992). The discontinuity effect in
interpersonal and intergroup relations: Generality and mediation.
In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social
psychology(Vol. 3, pp. 121–151). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Schroeder, D. A., Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., & Piliavin, J. A.
(1995).Psychology of helping and altruism: Problems and puz-
zles. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schuman, H., Steeh, C., Bobo, L., & Krysan, M. (1997). Racial at-
titudes in America: Trends and interpretations(2nd ed.). Cam-
bridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sears, D. O. (1988). Symbolic racism. In P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor
(Eds.),Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy(pp. 53–84).
New York: Plenum.
Sears, D. O., & Henry, P. J. (2000, July). The theory of symbolic
racism after thirty years: A current appraisal. Paper presented at
the annual meeting of the International Society for Political
Psychology, Seattle, WA.
Sherif, M. (1966). Group conflict and cooperation: Their social
psychology. London: Routledge and Kegan.
Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W.
(1961).Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave
experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.
Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1969). Social psychology. New York:
Harper & Row.
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (1996). Consensual social domi-
nance orientation and its correlates within the hierarchical struc-
ture of American society. International Journal of Intercultural
Relations, 20,385–408.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup
theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Simpson, J. A., & Kenrick, D. T. (Eds.). (1997). Evolutionary social
psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Skinner, M., & Stephenson, G. M. (1981). The effects of intergroup
comparisons on the polarization of opinions. Current Psycholog-
ical Research, 1,49–61.
Slavin, R. E. (1985) Cooperative learning: Applying contact theory
to desegregated schools. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 45–62.
Smith, E. R., & Henry, S. (1996). An ingroup becomes part of the
self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychol-
ogy Bulletin, 22,635–642.
Smith, H. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Justice and power: When will
justice concerns encourage the advantaged to support policies
which redistribute economic resources and the disadvantaged to
willingly obey the law? European Journal of Social Psychology,
26,171–200.
Spears, R. (2001). The interaction between the individual and the
collective self: Self-categorization in context. In C. Sedikides &
M. B. Brewer (Eds.),Individual self, relational self, collective
self(pp. 171–198). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Spears, R., Oakes, P. J., Ellemers, N., & Haslam, S. A. (Eds.),
(1997).The social psychology of stereotyping and group life.
Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape
intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist,
52,613–629.
Stephan, W. G. (1987). The contact hypothesis in intergroup rela-
tions. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psy-
chology: Vol. 9. Group processes and intergroup relations
(pp. 13–40). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Stephan, W. G., Diaz-Loving, R., & Duran, A. (2000). Integrated
threat theory and intercultural attitudes: Mexico and the United
States.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31,240–249.
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1984). The role of ignorance in
intergroup relations. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups
in contact: The psychology of desegregation(pp. 229–257).
Orlando, FL: Academic.
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory
of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and
discrimination(pp. 23–45). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., Martinez, C., Schwarzwald, J., &
Tur-Kaspa (1998). Prejudice toward immigrants in Spain and
Israel: An integrated threat analysis theory. Journal of Cross-
Cultural Psychology, 29,559–576.