marcin
(Marcin)
#1
time, can organize an effective and vigorous
poetic discourse which utilizes both ancient
and recent Neapolitan patrimony by
restructuring it in a new expressive fullness
with convincing and, I would say, significant
results. Sapegno points out that Pignatelli is
“within tradition, but beyond the line of Di
Giacomo and Russo, he knows how to take
the humors of Neapolitanness without
exploiting them, and transforms the
Neapolitan language into a high instrument
of poetry by infusing it with new freshness
and renewing its expressive felicity.”^18 This
seems to me a promising view for poetry,
whether or not Neapolitan. De Mauro has
also mentioned the “refined quality of these
poems”^19 , stressing how they remain
impressed in memory. This is still, if I am not
mistaken, “the deep, exciting manifestation