The Loss of Authenticity of the Bible.
As an answer to this misconception we may be allowed first to point out that the
authenticity of the Old and the New Testament has never been proved through a
constant chain of reliable reporters, a fact that we discussed earlier in this book in
sufficient detail. Therefore all these books, in our opinion, are dubious and uncertain
and thus any quotation from these books is not acceptable unless it can be proved
through undeniable sources that a particular statement really was made by Christ
because it is always possible that the verse in question may be a later addition
added by the ‘faithful’ at the end of the second century or in the third century in
order to refute the Ebionites, Marcionites or the Manichaeans. Or these additions
might have been included later on because they supported some commonly held
belief. So the chain is missing it is worthy of noting that even the types of Bible
differs: The first version: is the Hebrew version and is the version that is used by the
Jews and also by the Protestant church among the Christians.The second version: is
the Greek version, which was the foremost version amongst the Christians until the
15 th Century. The Christians used to consider the Hebraic version as abrogated, and
until today it remains the official version of the Greek Church and the Church of the
East.
The third version: is the Samaritan version, which is the version that the Samaritans
use. The differences between these three versions are great and many of the books
of the Old Testament were unaccepted by the Christians until the latter parts of the
3 rd Century, this demonstrate how unreliable the Torah is as well as the scriptures
of the Christians as their scriptures contains the torah of the Jews.
There seems to be no measurement for the acceptability or authenticity of any of
these Gospels at all no matter how many councils sit and agree, if another council
was to convene now could we discard everything that we have now in terms of
doctrine?
Even if the Christians in their delusions believe it to be the word of God we cannot
even consider it to be heavenly inspired.
If the earliest copy is in Greek a language that Jesus didn’t even speak how can we
consider it the word of God? Add to this the fact that this copy wasn’t discovered
except after 200 years after Jesus (pbuh).
What about the so-called New Testament?* Why does every Gospel begin with the
introduction - ACCORDING TO ... ACCORDING TO ... Why "according to?" Because not