They claim anything can be from God even if the author is unverifiable. So what they
claim is paramount to believing that the words of God are not protected.
So there we have it if it isn’t the words of God it leaves only one possibility that it is
the words of man, and man in his imperfect way is prone to forgetfulness, let alone
the changes and distortions that have taken place after all these years.
Another question is:
Is any part of the Bible verifiable?
The answer is a categorical no.
The Gospels that were written are numerous, however the four agreed upon differ
in terms of their content, so which one should be branded authentic?
Of the four Gospel writers, God "inspired" only two of them to record the genealogy
of His "son." To make it easy for you to compare the "fathers and grandfathers" of
Jesus Christ in both the "inspired" lists, I have culled the names only, minus the
verbiage. Between David and Jesus, God "inspired" Matthew to record only 26
ancestors for His "son." But Luke, also "inspired," gathered up 41 forefathers for
Jesus. The only name common to these two lists between David and Jesus is JOSEPH
and that, too, a "supposed" father according to Luke 3:23 (AV). This one name is
glaring. You need no fine-tooth comb to catch him. It is Joseph the carpenter. You
will also easily observe that the lists are grossly contradictory. Could both the lists
have emanated from the same source, i.e. God?
There are many books that claim to be from God, and it is upon the reader to search
and verify these claims.
Looking at it from another angle one should understand that the book the Christians
call the New Testament is not befitting to be attributed to god, the sheer filth that is
sprawled across its pages deny that any noble man authored it let alone God, who is
free from all imperfection.
Ahmed Deedat mentions a story where someone contacted the board of censors to
have 9 paragraphs removed in the name of taste and decency, [Ezekiel 23]
The profanity and detailed descriptions of sordid acts are unbefitting for anyone to
read let alone someone in search of guidance.
It leads the reader into a sexual state of arousal and couple that with the intoxication
that is permitted in Christianity and you have the ingredients of all things filthy and
indecent to take place, like what happens in during the holiday of other festivities.
Ahmed Deedat further challenged the Christian clergy saying to them that they
should read these filthy passages to their congregation wives, girls or fiancé. If they
are to find it difficult then they should consider how they are reading and spreading
this filth all over the world.