Project Management

(Chris Devlin) #1

176 Project Management


methods for physical pro-
gressing.
Determining the best
application depends upon
the nature of the activity
being measured. Using
techniques such as physi-
cal progressing helps
ensure that you and your
team members under-
stand progress in the
same way. It also sends a
message that you’ll be
measuringprogress, not
just recordingit.

Analyzing Deliverable Performance (Functionality and
Quality)


Analyzing the deliverables of the project—in particular, whether
they will meet functionality and quality targets—can be difficult.


Weighted
Milestones

Normal Application
Used when a major activity
consists of a number of equal
or nearly equal tasks, each
requiring about the same
amount of effort to complete.
Choose arbitrary, incremental
checkpoints, then determine
the progress that should be
made by those points.
Used when phases exist
within a major activity. It’s not
necessary for milestones to
be equally spaced.

Type of
Measurement

Units Completed

How it Works
If there were five equal tasks,
finishing one equates to 20%
complete, finishing two
equates to 40% complete, and
so forth.

Incremental
Milestone

25% 50% 75% 100%

20% 50% 80% 100%

Spec’d Designed BuiltInstalled

Figure 9-7. Three methods for physical progressing


Physical progressingA way
of expressing accomplish-
ment in tangible, verifiable
terms. For example, one of your team
members may report being “50% com-
plete” on a major piece of work. How
can you tell? If you’re using physical pro-
gressing methods, the task performer is
expected to produce something (a deliv-
erable, if possible) that will substantiate
that he or she has reached the agreed-
upon level of accomplishment. By doing
this, you and the task performer can
more accurately judge whether 50% is a
fair evaluation of status.
Free download pdf