Gruber, H. E. (1981).Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity(Rev. ed.).
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gruber, H. E. (1995). Insight and affect in the history of science. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E.
Davidson (Eds.),The nature of insight(pp. 397–431). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Guttentag, R. E. (1995). Mental effort and motivation: influences on children’s memory strategy
use. In F. E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.),Memory performance and competences: Issues in
growth and development(pp. 207–224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hatano, G. (1988). Social and motivational bases for mathematical understanding. In G. B. Saxe
& M. Gearhart (Eds.),Children’s mathematics(pp. 55–70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (2003). When is conceptual change intended? A cognitive-
sociocultural view. In Sinatra (Ed.),Intentional conceptual change(pp. 407–427). Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Haugeland, J. (1981). The nature and plausibility of cognitivism.Brain and Behavioral Sciences,
1 , 215–226.
Hilgard, E. R. (1980). The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation.Journal of the
History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 107–117.
Hirschfeld, L. A., & Gelman, S. A. (1994). Toward a topography of mind: An introduction to
domain specificity. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.),Mapping the mind: Domain
specificity in cognition and culture(pp. 3–35). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hoffman, M. L. (1986). Affect, cognition, and motivation. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins
(Eds.),Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior(pp. 244–280).
New York: Guilford.
Holton, G. (1981). Thematic presuppositions and the direction of scientific advance. In A. F.
Heath (Ed.),Scientific explanation(pp. 1–27). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Howe, M. J. A., Davidson, J. W., & Sloboda, J. A. (1998). Innate talents: Reality or myth?Be-
havioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 399–442.
Izard, C. E. (1977).Human emotions. New York: Plenum.
James, W. (1950).The principles of psychology(Vol. 1). New York: Dover Publications.
James, W. (1997).Selected writing (The varieties of religious experience). New York: Book-of-
the-Month Club.
Janis, I. L. (1972).Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Johnson, D. M., & Erneling, C. E. (Eds.). (1997).The future of the cognitive revolution. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, R. (1986). A triarchic model of P3000 amplitude.Psychophysiology, 23, 367–384.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differ-
ences in working memory.Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.
Kagan, J. (2002).Surprise, uncertainty, and mental structures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer-
sity Press.
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality.
American Psychologist, 58,697–720.
Kanfer, R. (1987). Task-specific motivation: An integrative approach to issue of measurement,
mechanisms, processes, and determinants.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5,
237–264.
Kasparov, G. (2003, February 16). Man vs. machine: A new era in computer chess. The Wall
Street Journal, Editorial Page. Available: http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=
110003081
Kintsch, W. (1998).Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge
University Press.
Kuhn, D. (2002). A multi-component system that constructs knowledge: Insights from
microgenetic study. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.),Microdevelopment: Transition processes
in development and learning(pp. 109–130). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1977).The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chi-
cago: University of Chicago Press.
34 DAI AND STERNBERG