be a valuable tool for the speaker to draw the
listeners’ attention to important points. The
speaker’s own style and personal preferences
can also a"ect how often he/she pauses.
In spite of these individual di"erences, we can
make some generalizations about thought
groups and how they are divided. According to
Celce-Murcia et al. (2010), thought groups have
these characteristics:
- A thought group has pauses or almost-pauses before and
after it. We pause between thought groups, but not
within them. A pause might not be a complete stopping
of sound. Instead, it might just be a slowing or
lengthening of the last stressed syllable of the thought
group. (Murphy 2013) - A thought group contains one prominent^ element. This
is the word that receives the most emphasis in that
thought group. (More information about prominence
begins later in this chapter.) - Each thought group has its own intonation pattern. That
is, the speaker’s voice goes up and down in a “melody”
for that stretch of speech. Because of this, thought groups
are sometimes called intonation units. (There’s more
about intonation in Chapter 11: “Intonation.”)- A thought group usually has its own
grammatical structure. It’s often a phrase, a
clause, or a sentence—a chunk of language that
feels like it has its own structure and expresses
a thought or a unit of meaning.
- A thought group usually has its own
Punctuation and thought groups
In writing, we can use punctuation to show the
boundaries of phrases, clauses, and sentences. In
spoken language, of course, there is no punctuation to mark
these grammatical units. Instead, the listener must pay
attention to pauses and intonation patterns. In the following
sentences, notice the di"erence in punctuation, pauses, and
intonation and see how the meaning changes:
“Tom,” said the teacher, “is brilliant.”
Tom / said the teacher / is brilliant /
Tom said, “The teacher is brilliant.”
Tom said / the teacher is brilliant /
Although the words are the same, the meaning is completely
di"erent. In the !rst sentence, the teacher is speaking and
Tom is brilliant. In the second, Tom is speaking and the
teacher is brilliant. Here’s another example:
129
10.1 Thought Groups and
Prominence