Resource Limitation of Insular Animals 325
assumes more normal levels (Davis 2001, Adler
unpublished data).
Clearly, frugivorous and granivorous mammals
regularly experience bottom-up limitation by sea-
sonal scarcity of resources, even in intact forests.
However, there is compelling evidence that fru-
givorous and granivorous mammals that live in
mainland tropical forests also are subjected to
strong top-down limitation (e.g., Terborghet al.
2001). In the absence of top predators, a trophic
cascade apparently results, leading to greatly
increased population densities of animal con-
sumers (Terborghet al. 2001), including rodents
(Lambertet al. 2003). Therefore, mammals iso-
lated on islands with depauperate predator com-
munities and where densities are much higher
thanonmainlandareasareexpectedtobeaffected
to an even greater degree by seasonal shortage
of resources and stronger bottom-up limitation.
To what extent are populations of herbivorous
mammals, when largely released from top-down
limitation, limited by bottom-up processes?
SPINY RATS AS A CASE STUDY
Introduction and methods
Since 1989, my students and I have been studying
the Central American spiny rat (Proechimys
semispinosus) on islands in the Panama Canal
as a model system to examine population pro-
cesses, including resource limitation. There are
over 200 islands available for study, and the spiny
rat is distributed widely on the islands (Adler and
Seamon 1991). Even tiny islands less than 0.1 ha
in area frequently contain rats if the islands are
close to larger landmasses, even though such
islands are too small to support persistent popu-
lations (Adler and Seamon 1991). Most islands of
more than 1 ha support persistent populations,
and the spiny rat is the only terrestrial mammal
that maintains such populations on those small
islands (Adler 1996). My students and I have
studied spiny rats on 76 islands ranging in size
from less than 0.1 to 1500 ha, and we selected
12 islands ranging in size from 1.7 to 3.9 ha
for long-term study to examine population-level
patterns and processes. We have conducted both
short-term studies (i.e., within a single season or
year) on geographical factors that influence spiny
rat distributions on islands, seed predation and
dispersal by spiny rats, mycorrhizal fungal spore
dispersal by spiny rats, and spacing patterns of
spiny rats, and long-term studies (i.e., spanning
several years) on demography and factors that
limit spiny rat populations, particularly resource
abundance. These long-term studies will be the
focus of this review.
Long-term study islands were selected because
they (1) were known or predicted to maintain
persistent populations, (2) were of a size that per-
mitted regular and thorough censuses, (3) were of
roughly similar size and isolation, and (4) differed
in tree species composition and forest structure
and therefore were likely to harbor populations
that differed in density and demography (Adler
2000). Because the long-term study islands main-
tain persistent and generally large populations of
spiny rats (often more than 100 or 200 individ-
uals), they (1) are amenable to both descriptive
studies and manipulative experiments to address
the question of population limitation by resource
abundance,(2)arelikelytoyieldlargesamplesizes
of individuals, and (3) are therefore appropriate
for robust statistical analysis. Because the islands
are isolated, they represent essentially closed sys-
tems from the perspective of spiny rat demog-
raphy and therefore ideal experimental systems.
Although there is circumstantial evidence that
spinyratsoccasionallyswimamongislands(Adler
and Seamon 1991), and we indeed recently docu-
mentedseveralinter-islandmovements(Lopezand
Adler unpublished data), we never recorded such
movements on the long-term study islands dur-
ing the study period. We therefore assume that
colonization events are rare along an ecological
time scale and have a negligible impact on the
demography of spiny rat populations.
We conducted monthly censuses of spiny rats
on each of the islands for 9 years (eight islands,
January 1991 through March 2000) or 7 years
(four islands, February 1993 through March
2000). For this purpose, we established perma-
nent sampling grids that covered the whole of
each island. Sampling points on the grids were
20 m apart, and each such point was occu-
pied by a live-trap. Live-trapping was conducted