FUNGAL STRUCTURE AND ULTRASTRUCTURE 65
molecule of a sister protein ββ-tubulinto form a dimer;
then the dimers polymerize to form tubulin chains. The
microtubules formed by this process interact with two
mechanochemical enzymes (motor proteins), kinesin
and dynein, and probably help to transport organelles
within the fungal hypha.
Actin microfilaments are much narrower than
microtubules, being about 5– 8 nm diameter. In the
slime mould Physarum polycephalumthe actin micro-
filaments are known to function in cytoplasmic
contraction, when actin associates with its motor pro-
tein, myosin. This could also be true of filamentous
fungi, where myosin-like proteins have recently
been detected. However, the most compelling evidence
for a role of the actin cytoskeleton in organizing
fungal growth has come from studies on the yeast,
Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This fungus has microtubules
but, in contrast to mycelial fungi, the microtubules
of yeast do not seem to be involvedin the transport
of major organelles; instead, they seem to function
mainly in orientation of the mitotic spindle. Yet, actin
cables do play a major role in directing secretory vesi-
cles to growth sites in yeast, and by analogy actin might
play a similar role in distributing the apical vesicles to
sites of wall growth in hyphal tips.
In later chapters we return to the roles of the
cytoskeleton in fungal growth (Chapter 4), differ-
entiation (Chapter 5), and the behavior of fungal
zoospores (Chapter 10). But we end this chapter by not-
ing that fungal tubulins differ from those of plants and
animals. They are inhibited by the antibiotic griseofulvin
and by the benzimidazole fungicides, whereas plant and
animal tubulins are insensitive to these compounds. This
is why griseofulvin can be used to treat the dermato-
phytic (ringworm) fungal infections of humans, and
why the benzimidazoles can be used to treat fungal
infections of plants (Chapter 17). Conversely, the
fungal tubulins (with the exception of Oomycota) are
unaffected by colchicine(the toxin from the autumn
crocus) which inhibits nuclear division in plant and
animal cells.
Cited references
Bartnicki-Garcia, S., Bracker, C.E., Reyes, E. & Ruiz-Herrera,
J. (1978) Isolation of chitosomes from taxonomically
diverse fungi and synthesis of chitin microfibrils in
vitro. Experimental Mycology 2 , 173–192.
Casadevall, A. (1995) Antibody immunity and
Cryptococcus neoformans. Canadian Journal of Botany 73 ,
S1180 –S1186.
Fisher-Parton, S., Parton, R.M., Hickey, P., Dijksterhuis, J.,
Atkinson, H.A. & Read, N.D. (2000) Confocal micro-
scopy of FM4-64 as a tool for analysing endocytosis and
vesicle trafficking in living fungal hyphae. Journal of
Microscopy 198 , 246 –259.
Grove, S.N. & Bracker, C.E. (1970) Protoplasmic organ-
ization of hyphal tips among fungi: vesicles and
Spitzenkörper. Journal of Bacteriology 104 , 989–1009.
Heath, I.B. (1978) Nuclear Division in the Fungi. Academic
Press: New York.
Heath, I.B. (1994) The cytoskeleton in hyphal growth,
organelle movements, and mitosis. In: The Mycota,
vol. 1 (Wessels, J.G.H. & Meinhardt, F., eds), pp. 43–65.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Hoch, H.C. & Staples, R.C. (1985) The microtubule
cytoskeleton in hyphae of Uromyces phaseoligermlings:
its relationship to the region of nucleation and to the
F-actin cytoskeleton. Protoplasma 124 , 112–122.
Howard, R.J. & Aist, J.R. (1979) Hyphal tip cell ultrastruc-
ture of the fungus Fusarium: improved preservation by
Fig. 3.20A fungal microtubule (arrowhead) closely asso-
ciated with a membrane-bound cellular organelle termed
a multivesicular body (MVB). Such close association indi-
cates a potential role for moving the organelle, through
the activities of motor proteins. (Courtesy of R. Roberson;
from Roberson & Fuller 1988.)