Table
8.2
Summary effects of urbanization models on 18 attributes measuring natural systems and their human uses. Four alternative spatial
models (Figure
8.2)w
ere superimposed on the 38 urban region maps (Color Figures), and attributes covered by urbanization were counted or
estimated at each of the three time stages in a model. Amount recorded is an index of effect or degradation due to urbanization, and the fourmodels were ranked accordingly from best to worst (
1
to
4 )for an attribute in a region (see Appendix II with rankings for all attributes and
regions). Number of urban regions measured excludes those where an attribute is absent or scarce on a region map. Attribute average rankingis for all urban regions measured. Best to worst model (Table columns) is based on comparing attribute average rankings. For asterisks, seefurther information in Appendix
II.
Concentric-zones
model
Satellite-cities
model
Transportation-
corridorsmodel
Dispersed-sites
model
Attribute measured
Numberof urbanregions
Attributeaver
age
ranking
Best toworstmodel
Attributeaver
age
ranking
Best toworstmodel
Attributeaver
age
ranking
Best toworstmodel
Attributeaver
age
ranking
Best toworstmodel
Biodiversity sites (%)
37
2.51
2
1.78
1
2.93
4
2.91
3
Recreation/tourism sites (%)
37
2.38
2
1.69
1
3.16
4
2.77
3
Fo
rest/woodland
∗
35
1.81
1
2.53
2
2.94
4
2.71
3
Grassland/pastureland
∗
10
1.95
1
3.45
4
2.6
3
2
2
Desert/desertified area
∗
42
1
2.63
3
2.88
4
2.5
2
Nearby slopes facing city
(% cover)
19
3.39
4
1.08
1
2.16
2
3.37
3
Rivers/major streams (km
length)
∗
38
2.32
2
1.89
1
2.82
3
2.97
4