simple H€uckel method (Section 4.3.3) and the extended H€uckel (Section 4.4.1)
method. Here, however, we have seen (in outline) how the equation may be
rigorously derived. Also, unlike the case in the H€uckel methods the Fock matrix
elements are rigorously defined theoretically: from Eqs.5.55
Frs¼
Z
frF^fsdv ð 5 : 61 ¼ 4 : 54 Þ
and Eq.5.36
F^¼H^coreð 1 Þþ
Xn
j¼ 1
ð 2 J^jð 1 Þ#K^jð 1 ÞÞð 5 : 62 ¼ 5 : 36 Þ
it follows that
Frs¼
Z
fr H^
core
ð 1 Þþ
Xn
j¼ 1
ð 2 J^jð 1 Þ#K^jð 1 ÞÞ
"
fsdv ð 5 : 63 Þ
where
H^coreð 1 Þ¼#^1
2
r^21 #
X
allm
Zm
rm 1
ð 5 : 64 ¼ 5 : 19 Þ
J^jð 1 Þ¼
Z
c$jð 2 Þ
1
r 12
cjð 2 Þdv 2 ð 5 : 65 ¼ 5 : 29 Þ
and
K^ið 1 Þcjð 1 Þ¼cið 1 Þ
Z
c$ið 2 Þ
1
r 12
cjð 2 Þdv 2 ð 5 : 66 ¼ 5 : 30 Þ
To use the Roothaan–Hall equations we want them in standard eigenvalue-like
form so that we can diagonalize the Fock matrixFof Eq.5.57to get the coefficients
cand the energy levelse, just as we did in connection with the extended H€uckel
method (Section 4.4.1). The procedure for diagonalizingFand extracting thec’s
ande’s and is exactly the same as that explained for the extended H€uckel method
(although here the cycle is iterative, i.e. repetitive, see below):
- The overlap matrixSis calculated and used to calculate an orthogonalizing
matrixS#1/2, as in Eq. 4.107:
S!D!S#^1 =^2 ð 5 : 67 Þ
2.S#1/2is used to convertFtoF^0 (cf. Eq. 4.104):
F^0 ¼S#^1 =^2 FS#^1 =^2 ð 5 : 68 Þ
204 5 Ab initio Calculations