Leadership and Epistemological Responsibility 179expressions of other approaches to the acquisition and production of
knowledge.
Indigenous knowledge and innovation systems must therefore be
sustained through active support to the communities who are keepers of
this knowledge, custodians of their ways of life, their languages; their
social organization and the environments in which they live.
10.6.2 Bio-diversity Erosion, Sustainable Ethics, and Livelihood
While innovations promise to be a key factor in promoting equitable
and sustainable development, it is recognized that there is a gross
asymmetry in the rights and responsibility of those who produce
Indigenous Knowledge in local communities and those who go about
valorising it in the formal sector. This brings to light the issue of the
ethics of extraction and responsibility (Gupta 1999). This must be
reversed.
In this context, it is important to understand the fact that biodiversity
erosion starts a chain reaction. The disappearance of one species is
related to the extinction of innumerable other species with which it is
interrelated through food webs. The crisis of biodiversity is therefore not
just a crisis of the disappearance of the species which serve as industrial
raw materials with potentialities for spinning millions of dollars for
corporate enterprises. It is, more basically, a crisis that threatens the
life-support systems and livelihoods of millions of people in developing
countries. Yet, efforts to build upon knowledge systems of people who
have maintained their natural resources so far are quite inadequate
(Shiva 1997).
The issue of value addition to innovations going on in local
communities is key to authentic development. In the area of bio-
diversity, value addition will help local communities co-exist with bio-
diversity resources by reducing primary extraction and generating long
term benefits. There is also a need to connect creative people engaged in
generating local solutions, which are authentic and accountable, thus