to encode and retain than equal-step scales,such advantages might be
apparent with infant listeners.
We presented infants and adults with transposed repetitions of three
ascending-descending scales:an equal-step scale that was used in previ-
ous research with adults (Shepard and Jordan 1984;Jordan and Shepard
1987),the major (unequal-step) scale,and a novel,unequal-step scale
(Trehub,Schellenberg,and Kamenetsky,in press),all of which are shown
in figure 23.4.The equal-step scale consisted of dividing the octave into
seven equal steps.In the novel,unequal-step scale,the octave was arbi-
trarily partitioned into eleven subdivisions,and a scale was constructed
with steps separated by one or two subdivisions.For each ascending-
descending scale,infants were required to detect a three/four-semitone
change in one tone;adults were required to detect a one/two-semitone
change.It was no surprise that adults performed better on the familiar
major scale than on either unfamiliar scale,but they performed no better
on the unfamiliar,unequal-step scale than on the unfamiliar,equal-step
scale.For Western adults with long-term exposure to music based on the
major scale,the ascending major scale is probably as familiar as most
tunes.Infants,for whom all scales were presumably unfamiliar,per-
formed significantly better on both unequal-step scales than on the
equal-step scale (figure 23.5). Moreover,the major scale had no
434 Sandra Trehub
Figure 23.4
Schematic illustration of major,unequal-step,and equal-step scales.Note that successive
tones in the major scale are separated by one or two semitones.Some steps in the unequal-
step scale are twice as large as other steps;step size in the equal-step scale (larger than
one semitone but smaller than two semitones) does not vary.(From Trehub,Schellenberg,
and Kamenetsky,in press.)
Fig.23.4